@shmeebegek1 you call me an idiot and yet you had to ask what do Black ppl have to do with affirmative action??? How many different ways can you say "I lost?" Wait, you still haven't realized it yet HAVE YOU? Only a simple minded person inflicted with dexification (go look up dexify) spirals down a path of ignorance & blind to his own non sequiturs. In short... the more you write the more you prove my point. Peace
@Nathanielc2 You, sir, are an idiot, a troll, or both. Your abuse of English grammar is evidence enough of that. I sincerely hope you are not representative of Rachel Maddow's viewership. Cheers.
@shmeebegek1 you said "I really have no idea what you're talking about." I can see that! Usually when one changes the topic, that person is bored with long-winded tangents or they realize a losing battle. Since you responded ...again, I will assume the later. There is no point in me directing and explaining Pat's racism since my previous post went right over your head...! i.e. A discussion about Affirmative Action, in your words... "What that has to do with black people is beyond me." Peace
@Nathanielc2 I really have no idea what you're talking about. I am aware that affirmative action often favors women in admission to particular colleges within some universities, for example in math or engineering. What that has to do with black people is beyond me. My comment asked why Pat Buchanan is being called a racist in the title of the video? What specifically did he say that was racist?
@shmeebegek1 Since you did not know that Affirmative Action benefitted white women (nor did you acknowledge this fact) then your summation was based on and aimed toward its original beneficiary... Black ppl. Or, you can now admit that you made a comment about something you know nothing of... so which is it? You said "it implies a pretty barbaric notion of justice to say that I "have a problem with women" You did not read... I said "IF," as in IF you did not then the statement is mute! Peace!
@Nathanielc2 It doesn't really affect me directly. I don't have a degree or any ambitions of attaining one. In any case, it implies a pretty barbaric notion of justice to say that I "have a problem with women" if I don't want to give them special privileges. Also, when did I mention black people?
I love Rachel Maddow's face from about 2:10 as she listens to Pat Buchanan's thinly veiled rasism!
DrAmorphos 1 month ago
What does National front think about people who are 1 quarter black?
Are Brits with Turkish ancestry considered white?
Are portuguese footballers such as Deco considered white?
what about Brits with Argentianian ancestry? Are they white?
What if you're a Brit who tans very easily and have brownish skin. Are you white then?
What about people from siberia or Kazakhstan? Are they white?
jigglyfidda125 8 months ago
@MsAgnosticatheist
She's not smart at all, honestly, she must be very stupid to be against her own people. It is very sad because
Jews are trying hard to keep the Whites from taking the country back.
UFOdisclosure1 10 months ago
Rachel is so smart, we need more empathetic and educated tolerant people like her in the media.
MsAgnosticatheist 11 months ago
@shmeebegek1 you call me an idiot and yet you had to ask what do Black ppl have to do with affirmative action??? How many different ways can you say "I lost?" Wait, you still haven't realized it yet HAVE YOU? Only a simple minded person inflicted with dexification (go look up dexify) spirals down a path of ignorance & blind to his own non sequiturs. In short... the more you write the more you prove my point. Peace
Nathanielc2 11 months ago
@Nathanielc2 You, sir, are an idiot, a troll, or both. Your abuse of English grammar is evidence enough of that. I sincerely hope you are not representative of Rachel Maddow's viewership. Cheers.
shmeebegek1 11 months ago
@shmeebegek1 you said "I really have no idea what you're talking about." I can see that! Usually when one changes the topic, that person is bored with long-winded tangents or they realize a losing battle. Since you responded ...again, I will assume the later. There is no point in me directing and explaining Pat's racism since my previous post went right over your head...! i.e. A discussion about Affirmative Action, in your words... "What that has to do with black people is beyond me." Peace
Nathanielc2 11 months ago
@Nathanielc2 I really have no idea what you're talking about. I am aware that affirmative action often favors women in admission to particular colleges within some universities, for example in math or engineering. What that has to do with black people is beyond me. My comment asked why Pat Buchanan is being called a racist in the title of the video? What specifically did he say that was racist?
shmeebegek1 11 months ago
@shmeebegek1 Since you did not know that Affirmative Action benefitted white women (nor did you acknowledge this fact) then your summation was based on and aimed toward its original beneficiary... Black ppl. Or, you can now admit that you made a comment about something you know nothing of... so which is it? You said "it implies a pretty barbaric notion of justice to say that I "have a problem with women" You did not read... I said "IF," as in IF you did not then the statement is mute! Peace!
Nathanielc2 11 months ago
@Nathanielc2 It doesn't really affect me directly. I don't have a degree or any ambitions of attaining one. In any case, it implies a pretty barbaric notion of justice to say that I "have a problem with women" if I don't want to give them special privileges. Also, when did I mention black people?
shmeebegek1 11 months ago