Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Petraeus: We're Not After the Holy Grail in Iraq

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,572
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 9, 2008

April 9, 2008

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Why doesn't Congress ask Bush questions like this?

  • It's called congressional oversight.

see all

All Comments (67)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • AND THE OIL... MR. PETRAEUS

  • you know they are looking for the grail. negro please

  • wexler is such a fag.

    His fake hysterical rants are more appropriate for a gay pride parade commencement speech than a congressional hearing.

    The General is being one of the most respected men in history, while Wexy is vying for Drama Queen of the year.

  • Gurl - google "goals of the surge" and tell me we've actually reached Bush's original benchmarks.

  • and when did he shout for more troops? when in his speech?

  • they have other troops,politicians,etc... who report to him about the situation on a ground and in the Iraqi Parliament. and we dont buy Iraqi oil dude! we buy our oil from Canada,Saudi Arabia,Mexico,and Venezuela!

    and yeah suicide attacks will still happen,but you cannot win a war by using suicide bombing alone!

  • "But you must go and learn to understand people, not go within a military and obey to stupid order. Make up YOUR OWN image, do not copy the one of your commanders."

    thats a very well written and thought out statement there!...not really. what are you trying to say here? he should re-style his hair or something?

  • ok,are you willing to take a walk in Sadr City? probably not. he's not subscribing to politicians or their ideology,in fact politicians dont like him because he reports the truth of progress!

    as a general,and a soldier he is focused on one thing,and one thing only, winning! and that is what my government should be focusing on as well!

  • LOL "the russians lost hundreds of tanks there"....yeah that was the 80's dude,and were not russians! the problem there was that the russians had a bunch of steel armored shit tanks! The only way that any Iraqi or Afghan insurgents could destroy a NATO tank,would be if they plant a fucking aircraft bomb near one! otherwise the NATO tanks could take in RPG's all day long!

    dont forget that!

  • ...yeah, more troops were sent months ago because of the surge! no additional troops are bieng sent,actually the surge forces are slowly re-deploying out of country!

    and the resistance in afghanistan isnt too heavy.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more