Kent Hovind cse 103 class 1 (part 4 of 7)
Loading...
Loading...
7:34
Kent Hovind cse 103 class 1 (part 5 of 7)by filmnut99645 views- 11:00
Evolutionists Vs. Evolution - The greatest debate ever / El mas grandioso debateby HushAndLearn40,403 views
- 6:17
Kent Hovind cse 103 class 2 (part 7 of 7)by filmnut99826 views
- 8:40
Why Do People Laugh At Creationists? (pt. 13)by stretchyrubberbands1,745 views
- 6:09
Kent Hovind on Bible Contradictions Part 1by magmango5,555 views
- 14 videosCreation Science 103 (YEC)
- 6:54
Kent Hovind on DNAby magmango509 views
- 2:00
Kent Hovind- "Slaughter 'Em Because I'm Right, They're Wrong"by SeenAndNotSeen9,812 views
- 7:40
The Age of the Earth Part-14 Ken Hovindby wilsongill1,414 views
- 3:39
Response to fused chromosome # 2.by ikester757919,407 views
- 10:02
kamimo Gypsy Christian Musicby mwhyx1,089 views
- 7:21
cse 104 class 10 part 8-11 What about Symbiosis relationships? why don't we have giant insects today?,is the sun shrinking ?by jesusLostChildren7771,224 views
- 7:43
Kent Hovind cse 104 class 2 part 9-9by jesusLostChildren777396 views
- 6:49
Kent Hovind cse 104 class 2 part 8-9by jesusLostChildren777345 views
- 25:00
Top 25 Creationist Fallaciesby ExtantDodo141,501 views
- 3:01
Letter to the CSEby eddygoombah8,853 views
- 9:59
Creation vs Evolution Debate/ Creacion contra Evolucion Debate / 創造對發展爭論by HushAndLearn29,523 views
- 1:50
Chromosomesby jls201242 views
- 10:14
T. Rex on Board "Noah's Ark" Part 3.1by Biogirl524,118 views
- 2:57
The Biology Songby bt1259042,864 views
- 2:51:18
hovind rainbow debateby ringo78118,804 views
why dont they publish his evidences is skeptic magazines or science related magazines ?
CheyennedeLuna77 1 year ago
98.2% exact match, but they are not related!?! How close do they have to be????
gregrutz 1 year ago
cleansedchristian, are you saying scientific theories just make themselves, and scientists have nothing to do with it? You need to think clearly here.
Also, the scientific theory is actually quite brilliant, and very detailed. It is my experience that creationists call it "stupid" because (1) they are ignorant about the relevant science, and/or (2) they are incompetent in regard to their lack of capability to comprehend the relevant science. It's the ignorance and incompetence that's stupid.
greeneto 3 years ago
we dont blame scientists we blame their stupid theory
cleansedchristian 3 years ago
He claims to have a PhD, and yet he doesn't know the letters of the bases... For the record the bases are lettered A (Adenine), which can only bond to T (Thymine) due to the hydrogen-bonding network, and the other bases are C (Cytosine), which can only bond to G (Guanine)... If he isn't aware of such basic science, it really is a mystery what he taught in science class for 15 years, when he would fail it himself. More creationist stupidity. Don't drop the soap 'Doc'!!
adm231987 3 years ago
I always laugh at creationists when they accuse scientists and science teachers of promoting "propaganda." In reality, biological evolution is part of professional science. Literally hundreds of research articles are published in the professionall science literature (in various fields of biology, and paleontology) every year. Creationism, on the other hand, doesn't even exist in professional science. So in fact, it is creationists generating and promoting propaganda, because it's all they have.
greeneto 4 years ago
In fact, it is Hovind who is missing the entire point. It is the *DNA* that is signifant, because it is the DNA that results in biological function and morphology. The chromosomes are the "packages" of the DNA.
And there he goes with another silly red herring analogy. Books are not biological organisms that propagate through genetic heridity.
greeneto 4 years ago