yeah i understand, and i was refering to the way it should be played, in this case Vivace which means more lively. i know you're practicing in this video
Bach was before tempo markings, but this one should probably have played faster; I think I was practicing control than what I would do in a performing context.
you might wanna keep on practicing to make it faster. and try to add more texture and dynamics. for example, you didn't use ANY of the stoccato where you were supposed to. and the volume was the same throughout the entire song. just keep on working on it!
Nice work. Could be a bit faster, but if you played it slowly intentionally it was great; very clear. By the way, at the beginning, there were a few sections where you played legato when it should have been staccato.
I am replying to myself. It should be played at at least 120.( quarter notes ) I was trying to sound musically smart lol. Good job by the way. hard song, but not too hard. You have to give it steady practice though.
True...speed impresses no one, but of course, this is played under tempo a bit, but better to play it cleanly and correctly as you are doing than fast and messy :)
yeah i understand, and i was refering to the way it should be played, in this case Vivace which means more lively. i know you're practicing in this video
libetta 2 years ago
Bach was before tempo markings, but this one should probably have played faster; I think I was practicing control than what I would do in a performing context.
joao024 2 years ago
because it's marked VIVACE.
libetta 2 years ago
Why are everybody soo bitchy about the tempo? You obviously like music. Carry on!
HerrWarja 2 years ago 2
good, but really really really slow...
you might wanna keep on practicing to make it faster. and try to add more texture and dynamics. for example, you didn't use ANY of the stoccato where you were supposed to. and the volume was the same throughout the entire song. just keep on working on it!
meganlovesyoo 2 years ago
it's too slow
Cuiling88 2 years ago
Nice work. Could be a bit faster, but if you played it slowly intentionally it was great; very clear. By the way, at the beginning, there were a few sections where you played legato when it should have been staccato.
Brianmystic2 3 years ago
i can play this twice as fast
witchcraftlord 3 years ago
I am replying to myself. It should be played at at least 120.( quarter notes ) I was trying to sound musically smart lol. Good job by the way. hard song, but not too hard. You have to give it steady practice though.
pianosfun 3 years ago
True...speed impresses no one, but of course, this is played under tempo a bit, but better to play it cleanly and correctly as you are doing than fast and messy :)
SsteinwayS 3 years ago