Wtc 7 - Windows blown out in the lobby

After both tower collapses you can see the wtc 7 promenade with doors and window intact. But I found pictures with broken windows too.
As I can't see heavy debris, was the paper that did this?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Explosion
• flashes
• squibbs
• fire
• wtc
• Twin
• Towers
• Building
• edited

[Clarrisani]

Hm. Broken windows = explosives. I'll keep that in mind in case a window here breaks.

[felicity5150]

Barry Jennings states that a huge explosion blew up the lobby before either of the towers fell. If you don't know who he is, google him. He died a few days before the final WTC7 NIST report came out. No word on cause of his death. It's been kept hush hush. Barry was a city official and credible witness to bombs going off in WTC7 that would have discredited the NIST report. Chalk one up to the bad guys.

[wtf0804]

@marvelfannumber1 Because truthers do not think things threw.

[marvelfannumber1]

@felicity5150

Now let's think about this logically- Why would they blow out the lobby 7 hours before 7 wtc collapsed excacly?

[jgoemat]

@felicity5150 So they kept setting off explosions one at a time until the building finally collapsed? You look at a building demolition and you can hear those explosions from blocks away, yet only the guys in the building heard them? Could it have been firefighters working? "Explosions" is a vague term.

[Clarrisani]

@Ahlywog As I have said in the past "explosions =/= explosives". GIven that the debris WAS sorted through despite what the deniers try to make people believe, there was nothing found that indicated that explosives were present. Anyhow, what was the point of having explosives? The towers fell on their own, which was better than what Al-Qaeda was expecting to happen. 

[Ahlywog]

@Clarrisani They thought the multiple ground level explosions they were hearing were from secondary devices. It wasn't an unfounded fear that in the course of the terrorist attack their MIGHT be bombs because of the 93 bombing. Ground level explosions were heard. Cars were reported exploding. If these were not fully investigated (and they were not) to disprove the bomb theory then you cannot say for sure that there were none.

[Clarrisani]

@Ahlywog There were no secondary devices. They THOUGHT there might be explosives because they were panicking and they had just been attacked by terrorists flying planes into the building and they had bee subjected to bombs in the past, but as it turned out there were none this time. I am simply pointing out that windows break for many reasons. In the case of WTC7, the windows were shattered by the collapsing buildings of WTC1 & 2.

[Ahlywog]

@Clarrisani Then I fail to see the correlation. You're comparing broken windows from an earthquake with broken windows from a terrorist attack in which explosions and "secondary devices" are reported liberally by everyone that day?

[Clarrisani]

@Ahlywog Earthquakes.

[Ahlywog]

@Clarrisani Terrorist attacks there too?