California Supreme Court Argument in Ross v. RagingWire
Loading...
Loading...
5,667
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 1:02:07Minnesota Supreme Court Video Oral Argumentby CitizensCouncilHC2,122 views
- 5:44Best Marijuana Argument Ever: Given By Superior...by HorseofPaulRevere161,348 views
- 1:07:39Brinker Restaurant Corp. et al. v. Superior Cou...by CaliforniaCourts3,036 views
- 1:34:38Hepting v. AT&Tby PublicResourceOrg2,842 views
- 10:00Kentucky Supreme Court Ricketts v Rhoades Oral ...by jgr04d1,730 views
- 18:12John Roberts: Supreme Court Nomination Hearings...by EMKInstitute6,863 views
- 9:54Florida Supreme Court Argument- Part 1by StembergerLaw1,886 views
- 5:48Moot Court Argumentby blannen211,216 views
- 4:33Oral Argument - GA Supreme Courtby warlawgroup490 views
- 3:50Chief Justice John Roberts on the topic of writingby courtpoint20,040 views
- 2:00:03USSC District of Columbia V. Heller Oral Argumentsby vaguninfo357 views
- 2:23Chief Justice Roberts on Oral Argumentby CSPAN28,888 views
- 1:02:08Fox Television v. FCC (2006)by PublicResourceOrg10,385 views
- 11:03Georgia Supreme Court Oral Arguments September ...by 1000ktspence343 views
- 1:46Sanchez-Collins Murder Trial Closing Argumentsby JohnEMacDonald354 views
- 2:16Junior Knits - Tear Gasby madpie109115 views
- 1:41The People's Court - Judge Milian Flips out on ...by halflip8762,589,262 views
- 2:31Court Argument: Compensate Bone Marrow Donors t...by InstituteForJustice4,919 views
- 3:11Voter Law Challenged at US Supreme Courtby coreyatEFF417 views
- 4:45DC v Heller, Supreme Court Oral Argumentby BradyCampaign1,601 views
I have to agree with the court here.
Because current Federal Law has MJ as a schedule 1 drug, there is always a danger of being federally prosecuted for it's possession, even if the person possessing it can legally have it by state law. Employers should have the right to fire (or not hire) someone on these grounds. Fact of the matter: it is riskier to employ someone who is a MJ user, because if that person ever gets into legal trouble w/ the feds it could be an immense cost to the employer!
asphyxiafeeling 1 week ago
Latino bride search engine online now busizz4me.info
dilsharagayani 8 months ago
As long as the Federal Gov can add sex offence to the list of disabilities the law will be unjustly discriminatory. When one person can get marinol but a sex offender can't it is unlawful discrimination. One person working can have the insurance pay but due to fed law a sex offender can not have the same relief is archaic and punishment for no other reason than to punish. Strike these laws before it is too late.
greenbookz 3 years ago