Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

WTC 7 - Window washers on scaffolding.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
61,001
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 27, 2008

From camera planet - Are they really washing WTC 7 windows?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • >> them guys were put there 4 a reason.

    You are correct and I know exactly what the reason is. Are you ready for it? There it is:

    They were put there to wash windows!

    But you didn't hear it from me, okay?

  • oh god if i was one of those guys id be like ahh....jerry...i think a plane might have just struck the wtc.....ya think well get paid extra? {:-)

see all

All Comments (75)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @marvelfannumber1 perhaps you better investigate NIST a bit more, real scientists all agree their report was fraudulent and went out of their way to avoid testing for explosives. NIST: 'no evidence of explosives'. Did you test for explosives? NIST: 'we did not test for explosives'. If you can accept the NIST official explanation then I guess you can rest assured that the official story is the truth. I cannot.

  • @edyken77

    Yeah F*** the like tousans of tousands of scientists and engineers involved with both N.I.S.T reports.

    P.s the collapse was not symmetrical, it destroyed 7 WTC

  • @marvelfannumber1 also, these are not my words, they are the opinions of highly credible architects, engineers and scientists. If you do YOUR research you will find the same things I am saying here. I am merely parroting the opinions of experts.

  • @marvelfannumber1 A controlled demolition can be done from any floor.  WTC1 and WTC2 show evidence of explosives all the way down from the floors where the fires were. Very heavy steel columns are being ejected latterly for many feet (up to 600 ft). This would not happen without explosives.

  • @edyken77

    Um a controlled demolition does not start from the top of a building do your reasearch.

  • @marvelfannumber1 do you dispute that the collapse was symmetrical? I'm not referring to the tops of the buildings as they canted to one side during the initiation of the collapses, I'm referring to the equal destruction on all 4 sides as the buildings came down. They can not do that unless it is a controlled demolition.

  • @edyken77

    Symmetry of WTV 1 & 2. Don't make me laugh.

  • There is no reason to be goaded into speculation by the truth critics. Stick with the facts: The freefall speed and symmetry of the collapse of WTC1, 2 and 7 defies fundamental laws of physics. Also the pyroclastic clouds are also key signs of demolition. And let's not forget the molten metal burning underground, and underwater. Too hot to be from jet fuel/office fires.

  • @ella5024 true dat

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more