Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Intelligent Design For Dummies Part 3 - Answering Critics

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
862 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 14, 2011

Building the foundation for intelligent design

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 24 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (199)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Intelligent Design for Dummies"

    Yep! It sure is!

  • God bless you for your willingness to absorb the slings and arrows of mind-numbed evolutionist Zombies. Thanks!

  • so in intelligent design.. this intelligent designer specifically designed diseases

  • @Answerquestions1 So what is the point of ID? It can't even determine what it is trying to prove.

    Name someone who can design and build a universe that is not a God.

  • @gregrutz

    , snow flakes are not designed, and they won´t pass dembski filter. the argumet is:

    -Everything that passes dembskis filter is designed

    - life passes the filter

    therefore life is designed.

    I can not prove scientificly that my god is the designer

  • @IloveYOUviruses ''can infer evolution in similar genes '' They don't.

    Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs) are lingering remnants of failed viral infection, which occurred in an ancestor's sex cell and got propagated in its offspring. The viral insertion site is completely random and finding one in the same location in two individuals indicates they each had that same ancestor. Humans and chimps have 98,000 ERV in the exact same location.

    Common ancestor?

    DNA shows how all life is related

  • @Answerquestions1 Please provide evidence that a snowflake is designed.  Please provide evidence that a designer is needed and god is the designer and your god is the one true god.

  • Dembski methos are used in archeology criminology foresinc science and many other sciences. for example archeologists have methods to determine if a something is a man made tool or just a natural occuring rock.

    but if evolutionists don´t like dembski methods then please provide a better method to determine if something was designed

  • I always thought that ID was something of an alternative to Evolution. However, on 13:00 and 14:16 Dembski speaks of "chance" and "random[ness]", which has nothing to do with Evolution. So what are you on about?

  • @GWJumpman Oopsy, I should have checked the other comments before posting mine...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more