Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Bruce Lipton - Biology of Perception 3 of 7

see part 1 for info.... see also: rob williams intro to psych-k http://www.youtube.com/watc... more audio/video at http://channelzero.multiply...  
 
Customize

More From: 00zeronian

Loading...

Playlist(24)

7:36
7:36
10:00
9:36
10:00
10:00
8:51
10:00
5:10
2:28
3:14
0:12
0:20
3:39
1:13
3:32
1:40
3:25
4:57
10:19

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
111 ratings
Sign in to rate
29,790 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (89)   Options

Loading...
Mike3gdc (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
fascinating discussion...thanks for sharing this vid
arzoyan (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
The lies and distortions in all walks of life are so insidious that majority have lost the real sense of themselves and the truth of our humanity . We have become money worshiping cowards, betraying our forefathers and the generations to follow. Stand in love and cooperation for our common well being for our common home the EARTH,
ExtantFrodo (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
LOL, How can you sit there and say i was wrong when I've shown that nothing I've said was wrong? Show how ERVs and pseudo genes are not junk then you have a case. Till then you've done nothing but handwaving. Remember it's YOUR claim that there is zero junk. Claiming that we MIGHT at some unspecified future point find these things are not just is not verification that I'm wrong.
Again I did not claim there was no effect of the mind upon the body for there to exist a wrong claim.
ExtantFrodo (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I think we can dismiss further claim by you as putrid lies and unsubstaniatable bogus claims.
ProudToBLoud (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@ExtantFrodit is best to ditch the junk dna hypothesis and assume activities will be found, and until i pointed out the scientific studies you did not fess up about the role of mind on body, quit lying.
ExtantFrodo (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I think it's fairly safe to ignore what you think has anything to do with research. Your calling a junk DNA hypothesis is a great example. YOU have an attachment to the outcome because you have attach a significance to a particular result. I do not care whether there is junk or not. It would not influence any decision of what to investigate or fund in DNA research. Look how much it matters to you.
ProudToBLoud (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I didn't call junk dna a hypothesis john mattick did LOL


AS for having an attachment it obviously matters to you that is why you desperately hold to it, it matters to you very much, and I am sure that it hurt you very much when these strands were found to have function LOL
ExtantFrodo (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
yes, you so often express certainty about me that is utterly wrong. It's never been entertaining really, just boring.
ProudToBLoud (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@ExtantFrodo

Oh I was just pointing out your projection, if you find your subconcious beliefs boring then it is a problem for you.
ProudToBLoud (2 weeks ago)
Comment removed by author

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.