Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (194)
-
This is hilarious, yet ridiculous. Unicorns, leprechons, the tooth fairy, etc... are obviously all made up. There is no reason to believe any such things exist. I haven't stumbled upon a mysterious pot of gold or rainbow colored horse poo, so I would assume these things are made up. There is much arrogance in comparing these things to the existence of an intelligent force that may very well be responsible for our existence.
-
@IoIocaust king james is a version of the bible... not a book of it.
-
I searched through my phone, all 200 or so names and no theists sorry I couldnt help ;)
-
I sat down and really thought about this, and after some profound pondering, I've come to the realization that unicorns must exist.
-
@IoIocaust They also think that rain is God letting water out of the sky. Leviticus 26:3.
-
@minescore Failing to take your medication is a bad idea.
-
It is interesting how you say unicorns or dragons have never existed. Now before you attack me cause I just said that think about it a unicorn literally means one horn. Doesn't need to be a horse. There is proof that there was a creature with one massive horn like a bull called a re'em. This was in the Hebrew bible and also in Assyrian stories. Conclusion re'em=unicorn. Now dragons= dinosaurs was invented in the 1800s. Dinosaur means large lizard dragons are large lizards.
-
Death: Your brain stops working and its bye bye time.
Simple enough?
Also go fuck yourself.
if a christian says he dont believe in unicorns, he's not much of a chistian. I mean. . the unicorn is a biblical creature. its both in king james and job
IoIocaust 1 year ago 14
I am not claiming there can be no god. I am claiming that the bible is NOT the inspired word of god(nor any of the desert dogmas). Morality remains a timeless human quality. There are good things in the bible but there's an aweful lot of rubbish too. Human reasoning can see the difference. And nothing in the bible suggests it was written by anything other than humans. It subsists for many historical reasons but that does not make it correct.
kentmage 3 years ago 6