Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Reply to "Dawah to an atheist? "Dr. Zakir Naik gets powned!"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
18,556
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 24, 2007

Here are all the answers to the rather illogical questions asked by brother Subach. I tried to cover the questions from second part as well but Ill make a separate video for them.

Just one advice to brother subach before you start bashing up people, keep your mind open and think logically on scientific grounds. Accept bitter scientific truths if they DONT go in your favour as you happily accept those facts which are IN your favour. Science is Universal.

Before you all start flaming me with your comments, Thanks for watching and May God(Allah) guide you all in the straight paths.

  • likes, 56 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The narrative is muddled, the ideas vacuous and derivative, the tone often hysterical and bellicose, remarkably empty of content for a book that size, untranslatable because up to 20% of the text is actually gibberish according to the best arabic scholars, that's that sorry excuse for a holy book, called the Qur'an, a 7th century Book of Mormon, the sickly brain-child of an hallucinating Meccan merchant.

  • Muhammad's failure to mention the ovum, when describing the process of conception, is clearly an error. This error is due to his 7th-century view of things. He didn't have a clear notion of conception being a merging of the male and female gametes. Can't blame him. It WAS rather negligent of Jibreel, however.

see all

All Comments (490)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @IpsaPaphum You are such a loser start using your brain you idiot,have you actually read the book?NO i didn't think so.

  • religions are to close peoples minds. Schools exist to educate. Religions exist to indoctrinate.

  • Stop hating on DocQamar you're just made he proved the athirst wrong...

  • @IpsaPaphum 20% is gibberish according to the best arab scholars. haha think someone's coming up with fake statistics.

  • @IpsaPaphum I don't think a normal sain person who had read the qur'an atheist, muslim orchristian in arabic on in any translation of meaning would say such words. you say according to the BEST arabic scholars it's gibberish, can you tell us some of these scholars ?

    Have you even read it ? or are you just heared and repeated ?

    Take this exemple, can you go and talk about a book of Science and insulting his writer without even reading it ? i'm sure you won't. what about a whole religion.

  • ya ppls are so ignorant..fags..why did u cut and added the vid? cuz u afraid that ppl will find the truth.......ya narrow minded idiot will never get the truth in ur head cuz of ya been ignorant....and thats the truth..fags..

  • I don't understand why people still argue about this. The Koran contains no scientifically verifiable miracles. It contains no science. How can it?

    Naik, even if he was an M.D. is an complete idiot when it comes to science.

    The problem with Muslims is that they have such a deeply rooted belief system embedded in society that the slightest critical remark sets off a defence mechanism which blocks out all rationale. They think that a book saying it was revealed makes it the truth.

  • when u claim that he knows what he is talking about whn he talks abt science i wonder hw he passed his exams. he is not a scientist, all scientist specialise in a certain subject nd dont know everything in depth outside there field. nd he is not a scientist a mbbs from Topiwala National Medical College and Nair Hospital in Mumbai!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more