Noam Chomsky on 911 conspiracy par1

Noam answers conspiracy claims

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• noam
• chomsky
• 911
• conspiracy

[DeweyZinnChomskyFisk]

bush doesn't need to have been the mastermind of 9/11. the people who carried out the attack were officially formed, armed and trained by the US as a terrorist organization in 1979, and chomsky has stated this. the same corporations/politicians who did that in 1979 are the same people backing W. bush. chomsky knows this and has stated that anyone who wants to learn about al qaeda should read Jason Burke.

[waitew]

@ctcole77 "If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?"[Quote] PLANES?Really?6 minutes after WTC1 was struck (8:46) (ie at 8:53am) exactly what hijacked planes were they aware of that they were ordered to intercept? Answer that! I challenge you!

[waitew]

@ctcole77 I'll answer your 1st question.6 minutes after WTC1 was hit (according to the official story of today) They knew of NO other hijacked aircraft to intercept!So,your question is a LIE!But according to the original official story(until at least 9/16/01) those planes weren't scrambled at all cos none were until after the Pentagon strike(9:36),but from 2001-2004 they did know about FL 175 & FL77 Before they hit their targets & scrambled in time to stop both.The times have been changed.

[waitew]

@ctcole77 I see.You can't answer my questions.so,you attack them instead.Ok,got you.

[ctcole77]

@waitew This isn't a game show gullible shill. There's no need to phrase your "answers" in the form of unrelated questions. Just answer the questions - UNLESS YOU'RE AFRAID OF THE TRUTH!

[waitew]

@ctcole77 1.How do you explain both sets of fighters (Otis & Langley) were set out over the ocean AWAY from the 'attacking' aircraft? 2.How can you explain that no shoot down order was issued until after the last airliner (93) had crashed,that NEADS commander Col. Marr refused to relay the order to the fighter pilots & that the pilots say they NEVER any time that day got a shoot down order?

3.Why did they say WTC7 was going to "blow up"?How did they know when within a few minutes?

[bassefa1984]

Ron Paul 2012

[MrLettuceguy]

@ctcole77 Exactly thats why its so suspicious!!!! Why would the biggest super power in the world send one plane 6 mins late? Cheney was never in charge of NORAD which makes it worse and finally the fact that people new it was coming down proves they had inside info. How are you proving truthers wrong exactly?

[ucancallmeOh]

@ctcole77 ~ Let's have an HONEST investigation, and find out! Or, we could have a criminal trial.  The evidence is there. WTC 7 is the "smoking gun", but there's plenty of evidence for the other aspects of the mass murder.

Regarding WTC 7: There is hard evidence of CD (controlled demolition). As for what the firefighters knew, that's not as important as hard evidence. NIST reports it was "office fires". It was not office fires, it was CD, and this can be proven in court.

[ctcole77]

3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?

How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?

If WTC 7 was destroyed via controlled demolition, how do you explain firefighters predicting the building's collapse 3 hours before the actual collapse?