Quick Draw

A news package about a fund raiser in Central Wisconsin that benefited the United Way. Local celebrities were brought in and paired with professional quick draw competitors for a competition.

Produced at WSAW Newschannel 7 in Wausau, Wisconsin. Written and voiced by Lauren Burgoyne, photographed and edited by Erik Cieslewicz.

Note: This package won Second Place for Best News Video from the Wisconsin Broadcasters Association for 2007.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• quick
• draw
• competition
• united
• way
• charity
• television
• news
• package
• burgoyne
• cieslewicz
• wisconsin

[XDrakopowerX]

Why is all the audio coming out of my left speaker?

[erik8781]

@XDrakopowerX The audio is mixed the way WSAW, the station that aired this piece, wanted it. All of the "natural sound" is mixed into the right speaker, so the background noise of the action on screen is there, while the "sound," that is the interviews and reporter track, were mixed in to the left speaker.

Many news organizations mix their sound like this so if they re-use the b-roll from the story in a new story they can still have the natural sound.

[StoneShoulderz]

I'll answer your question.

Guns can be used for charity when responsible adults and sometimes youngsters use firearms in a non-violent scenario, such as this.

Firearms are only tools, and like all tools firearms can be used improperly and for the wrong reasons.

Fast draw (This video) are people who are under the super-vision of professionals, and they are shooting wax bullets (non-lethal).

Guns dont cause crime, people are the result of crime.

[Lookatthis1000]

@XDrakopowerX It is on my right :O

[darkworldinc]

She looks good in that gun belt.

[aleksandr974]

beauty of america

[commonsense369]

Part 3:

Once again you typed before your brain could tell you how silly you sound. I'll break it down for you because I believe your not cognitively equipped to communicate your thoughts via text or understand a person with an IQ over 58.

You resort to name calling such as "prick" and "asshat" as well as approve of a person who would piss in my coffee--but several words later you lecture me on my need to "MAKE" friends. Do you see the obvious conflict here? If not, I'm not surprised.

[commonsense369]

My final reply:

You are upset that you misspoke (in type) and I called you on it. You denied it, and again, using your own words, I proved you to be a simple blatteroon. Your declaration not wishing to continue a dialog with me notwithstanding, you still replied on the thread.

Furthermore, instead of acknowledging from the beginning that your comment was deluded, you deflect and divert attention from the point I made with superfluous comments.

Part 1

[commonsense369]

Con't part two:

Underestimating someone is foolish, and for you to blindly make fun of someone only proves your intolerance and stupidity.

Just be nice, aint that hard.

[commonsense369]

@StoneShoulderz : Just say it: "my bad" you cant admit you effe'd up your comment.

When had I ever told you how much I make? How do you know?

I haven't started stupid problems, have I? What problem? Pointing out your a dullard, that's a "problem" for you?

I'll post the pm you sent me so your limited cognitive ability can be seen by all.

I forgot what the original topic was.

[StoneShoulderz]

@commonsense369

Im not the one going around being a YouTube Nazi.

Im not the one telling everyone they are wrong to give their opinions.

I do find it interesting how people like you survive in this world.

You are more suited to be the "politician" you speak of.

Coming out of nowhere telling people they are incorrect, and how righteous you are.

A ditch digger makes more money than you, they work for a living, while you sit at home on your little room starting stupid problems.

Sack up kid..