Why Ethiopians look the way they do.

Although this winds up many Africans and black Americans no end, every DNA study of East Africans shows them to be about 40% Eurasian.

European don't look like like Ethiopians because modern humans came from that area-the first humans out of African looked more like Neanderthals then any modern human group. Ethiopians look a bit like Europeans and Arabs becasue they have a lot of Caucasoid ancestry.

For some relevant reading check this book link to see wwhat the worlds foremost DNA specialist has to say, page 174.
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=FrwNcwKaUKoC&pg=PA172&lpg=PA172&am...

I"n summary, the information available on individual groups in Ethiopia and North Africa is fairly limited but sufficient to show that they are all seperate from sub Saharan Africans and that North Africans and East Africans (Ethiopians and Neighbours) are also clearly separate. Estimation of admixture by standard methods has given values of about 60% African and 40% Caucasoid using sub Sharans as African parents and Southwset Asians as Caucasoid parents."

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Ethiopia
• Somalia

[scruffypair]

Fulani cluster with west africans (and have no 'forigeign dna'

Actually Fulani do show some Eurasian Y DNA. Thanks for displaying your ignorance in public.

[scruffypair]

Finally, I have shut down the comments here, as I no longer have time to bicker with idiots while I should be getting my coursework in on time.

[MysticNinjaJay]

@scruffypair It sounds to me like you are threatened by our counter arguments. If someone is blatantly trolling and spamming your videos all you have to do is block them and delete their comments. Don't be a coward.

[MysticNinjaJay]

@amor60643 She has no proof. If she did she would be able to tell us WHEN these supposed Wandering Caucasoids appear in the fossil record. When did they migrate to East Africa creating the hybridization she speaks of and where is the evidence that East Africans looked different in antiquity than they do today? Her only evidence is a few flawed DNA studies that do not address East African face form. She merely draws her conclusions from their estimates of Eurasian admixture.

[scruffypair]

@MysticNinjaJay

I'm simply repeating that multiple geneticists have noted a chunky amount of West Asian ancestry in East Africans, due to several prehistoric back migrations.

Like I said- Your racism (black skinned people with the same typs of ancestry as Egyptians can't be mixed) is just screamingly obvious.

[scruffypair]

@MysticNinjaJay

the Affroasiatic language family was spread by East Africans into North Africa and Southwest Asia during the Neolithic period

Actually the current theory is swinging more to an Asiatic origin fo AA languages due to some very good reasons. Funny how you pretend it's been 'proved' to beAfrican though, as it reconstructs with Asian neolithic animals and has a proximity to PIE and Sumerian, neither of which are African.

The Neolithic originated in Asia. Not Africa.

[scruffypair]

@MysticNinjaJay

HMM, lets see. the wide arrya of Y chr studies that I'm sure you are familiar with that show modern Egyptians have PN2 Y chrs that date back to teh dawn of time in Egypt. You know, more so than most of teh black Sudanic tribes and teh Amhara.

Islamic records and the records of the Britsih in Egypt recors that the Cairo slave market alone cleared 5,000 slaves a yesr. PLus the Dakleh cemetery from 2k ago shows way less black mt dna than present.

[scruffypair]

@MysticNinjaJay

threatened by our counter arguments

No, I'm just too busy to fart around with my YT account these days.

[scruffypair]

@MysticNinjaJay

I notice your phobia of 'admixture' only applies to black African populations. I see your lot trying to pretend the M81 in North Africans and m78 in Europeans as a simple percentage of black ancestry. There have been at least three population movements into Africa in the last 40k (Dabban, Capsian and Neolithic) and plenty of milling around inside Africa in between. And Tiskoff never said there was no admixture, FYI, she just said SIMPLE admixture was unlikely. More Afrocrap.

[scruffypair]

@MysticNinjaJay

Well, since we have J at quite a high pecentage in the remains of the Guanches, pre Isalmic North Africans; bang goes your crap again, unless you want to claim the neolithic settlers from Asia (who supplied the R1b in Chadic peoples) magically skipped right over Egypt. Anyway, the percentage of J1 in Egypt isn't massively high once you average out all the studies, the Amhara have more and so do Nubians.

[MysticNinjaJay]

@scruffypair OK where is your source that the Y-Chromosome data shows a minuscule impact by invaders during the Greco-Roman and Islamic periods? Where is your source for estimates of the invaders numbers? And where is your source that millions of Black women were imported as sex slaves into Egypt?

[MysticNinjaJay]

@scruffypair East Africans have languages in the same family as North Africans and Middle Easterners because the Affroasiatic language family was spread by East Africans into North Africa and Southwest Asia during the Neolithic period. North Africans have absorbed Eurasians at various times in history in the Nile Valley particularly during historical times. There is absolutely no evidence that East Africans were of a phenotype different than they are today and changed due to foreign admixture.