A todo el mundo le gusta la no violencia, pero la realidad actual y la historia demuestran que no siempre es posible. A veces se acusa al escritor Derrick Jensen de "inflamador" por sus razonamientos, pero parece que el tiempo le irá dando cada vez más la razón, pues en muchos países la palabra "indignados" se quedará corta para describir la sensación de la gente si no se cambia la trayectoria de la civilización moderna de inmediato.
En este fragmento Derrick Jensen es entrevistado por Amy Goodman,
En este canal hemos subtitulado otros vídeos de Derrick Jensen, véanse en:
Cuando todo se venga abajo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDhsmC4tdx8
Derrick Jensen - ¿Qué haríamos si fueran alienígenas?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVxm0QkeX_Y
¿Qué nivel de destrucción hará que empieces a oponerte?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Bx91yTeSyA
I $AY; HUMANITY TOTALLY IN$ANE*(... THE END*, is coming over u$...happy nye2012
faraon2012 2 months ago
@wda013 A few years ago a volcano produced more CO2 than the sum of thousands of years of humans, that in a single eruption. The CO2 does not cause global warming, and most scientists say so. Watch the video, appearing in several of the same and I'll explain better. There may be some translation errors, I use the google translator.
NandoGSI10 5 months ago
@wda013 I never said that the idea occurred to the politicians, they were the same for drivers of economic convenience. Who initiated the idea was a scientist, but without evidence. In fact, tests have now refuted the idea, but there is so much money created around the same, that politicians do not want to accept it. Watch the video that you pass and you'll understand.
NandoGSI10 5 months ago
@NandoGSI10
> Sorry for my english - no problem!
(A)GW = (Antropogenic)Global Warming.
and fossile CO2-release is --only by agreement of 99% of scientists, and my personal, humble, but well-educated opinion-- a (if not the) major cause of GW.
btw: it was not politicians/governors who came up with the idea of aGW, but scientists and other educated&concerned people (like some (sci-fi-)writers) who began to warn the world about it, decades before he first politician noticed (as old me remembers)
wda013 5 months ago
@wda013 Hi. Sorry, i dont understand very well the english. ¿what is GW? Im saying the human CO2 isnt the causant of the global warming. Im saying the CO2 in general isnt the causant of the global warming.
/watch?v=QcsImZaYMac
The sun and the clouds are the causant, and the radiation of the sun. Our planet always was having global warmings and global coolings, the CO2 isnt the causant.
Sorry for my english :S
NandoGSI10 5 months ago
@NandoGSI10
(no hablo espanol) are you saying that it's a lie by governments that human-released (fossil) CO2 is a (major) cause of GW ? -- this I, for one (mag.rer.nat.) consider utter BS. Yes: governments lie. But no, that does not prove that all they say is false. And that the release of fossile C is a major cause of GW is about as certain as that, say, stones fall to the ground and not upwards. Educate yourself & have alook at the data: (changing)ph of oceans, ratio of C-12/C-13 in corals..
wda013 5 months ago
Buen discurso aunque discrepo con el en varios puntos. Por ejemplo no se sabe bien a que se refiere cuando habla sobre los oceanos y el medio ambiente. El que el CO2 producido poducido por el hombre sea el causante del calentamiento global es una mentira que crecio porque a una gobernante la interesaba. Si no se refiere a eso entonces me callo xD.
NandoGSI10 5 months ago