Dark Prince The True Story of Dracula 2000 part 1
Top Comments
All Comments (801)
-
waw
-
@nielsdejong :)
-
@Thoralmir I agree with you 100%
-
@lolliegag100 no. dracula isnt real unless you want to associate him with vlad the impaler
-
wait, so is dracula really a vampire?!?!
-
@CoVeRxXxJuNkEe In Hitler's case, he was clearly batshit insane and sought to conquer and exterminate people who bore no real threat to him or his country. Vlad had to deal with corrupt nobles who had sold him, his family, and his nation out for their own selfish gains, and he had to deal with savage foreign invaders. He couldn't defend his homeland if he did not have tight control over it. He was the kind of leader that Romania needed at that time.
-
@Thoralmir in ur comment u made it sound like Vlad the impaler wasn't to b blamed for his actions because we don't know the whole story but it doesn't matter who sounded worse, they both were evil. its like saying we have no right to condem hitler because what he did was during a time of war.
-
@CoVeRxXxJuNkEe Both Dracula and Richard III impaled/slaughtered tens of thousands of muslims, yet ol' Richy is considered a hero. For his day, Dracula was about as harsh as any other ruler at the time. He just knew how to work his reputation to his advantage better.
-
@Thoralmir I'm sorry what part of impaling people doesn't strike you as evil?
-
@SuperHardrider =))
Now we need a new Dracula to impale some poloticians
RealVincent1989 5 months ago 37
@cutiemonica100 He was not a vampire, that's just a bedtime story! And also NO, Vlad was no bitch faced pretty boy!
GAY ACTOR
TooAnnoyed 4 months ago 6