Why do "Liberals" Support Wars Based On Lies?
Uploader Comments (J1Goro)
Video Responses
All Comments (7)
-
he will get me rights
-
Wrap my head around it? Way to perpetuate the stereotype of the typical condescending Paul supporter, well done. Notice I used the word "we" in my original post. Anyway, I've been a supporter of Paul's from the beginning, but if Nader runs, he gets my vote. If not, it will most likely go to Paul...that's, again, if Paul does the smart thing and runs as an Independent (or somehow wins the Republican nom, which you know is highly unlikely).
-
Can you not wrap your mind around voting for Paul?
-
He is for the states making the determination of
marriage rather than the Federal government. Though marriage is a religious institution which gays should do not support.
-
Because you say so? He doesn't pole any higher than the other two, and Nader hasn't even decided whether or not to run yet. I think he needs to run as an independant, where his base is, if he wants to be though of as "viable."
-
He's the only viable anti-war candidate in this election obviously.
-
Support our 9.1 trillion deficit to China in supporting any other candidate than Ron Paul.
Kucinich not only opposes wars based on lies, but will investigate and prosecute those responsible for this one, where Paul say's he'd support impeachment if an investigation turned up evidence that he doesn't feel exists at the moment. Add in Gravel and you've got 3 candidates who oppose illegal wars, not one...just because we like Paul doesn't mean we need to pretend he's the "only" option in that regard.
brouhajoe 4 years ago
Kucinich pulled his impeachment stunt which he knew would never pass the house judiciary and divided anti-war people. He blew it on a grand scale. Ron Paul is the only anti-war candidate that will unite liberals and conservatives in a viable presidency run.
J1Goro 4 years ago
As for Impeachment, it's not a "stunt," it's the thing that people with a shred of integrity fight for when forced to be complicit with war crimes committed in our name with our money. Paul's dodge of the issue is a copout in my opinion, though I still support him over all. And anti-war people are the ones screaming for impeachment, they are united for it, so Kucinich didn't divide anyone, (though you may be the exception to that rule).
brouhajoe 4 years ago
Why did I respond to twenty comments from people
saying, "Why doesn't Rp support the impeachment provision and I'll never vote for him"? When only Republicans supported it. It was a stunt in the way he used his impeachment privileges without any time for debate. Sorry you're wrong.
J1Goro 4 years ago