IJ on the Individual Mandate
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on Feb 23, 2012
Listen to an in-depth podcast about this subject here: http://ij.org/freedomcast/4336-mutual...
If government-mandated health insurance is upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court after the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) case is argued in March 2012, the Institute for Justice warns in its amicus brief that there will be dire and predictable threats to individual liberty and voluntary relations that have been the foundation of American contract law for centuries.
Constitutional law professor Elizabeth Price Foley, who is the executive director of the Institute's Florida Chapter and who co-authored IJ's brief, said, "The individual mandate violates a cardinal rule of contract law—to be enforceable, all agreements must be voluntary. The Framers understood this, and would never have given the federal government the power to force individuals into lifelong contracts of insurance. The Court should not allow the government to exercise this unprecedented and dangerous power."
As IJ's brief shows, the principle of mutual assent, under which both parties must consent for a contract to be valid, is a fundamental principle of contract law that was well understood during the Founding era and is still a cornerstone of contract law today. Indeed, contracts entered under duress have long been held to be invalid. Yet the mandate forces individuals to enter into contracts of insurance that would never be valid under this longstanding principle. (For a copy of IJ's brief, visit: www.ij.org/PPACAbrief.)
If the U.S. Supreme Court fails to strike down the individual mandate, there will be nothing to stop Congress from forcing people into other contracts against their will—employment contracts or union membership, for example. If we still have a constitutional republic in which the federal government's powers are limited, then the Court should strike down this law.
The Institute for Justice's brief is the only amicus brief filed with the Court that examines this case in the context of the history of contract law. The brief illustrates how the Supreme Court has recognized the principle of consent in commercial relations in its Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment cases, and it explains why the U.S. Supreme Court has a key role in acting as a check against this unconstitutional power grab by the federal government.
Standard YouTube License
- 1:06:06 Sovereign Freeman Gordon Hall Pt 3 of 17 on Contracts, Law, Court, Judgementsby Freedomwatch.usFeatured 4,484
- 1:56 Can the Government Make Entrepreneurs Do Useless Things For No Reason?by InstituteForJustice 19,065 views
- 3:57 How are food truck entrepreneurs like the Buffalo Bills? They're unrelenting underdogs & dreamers.by InstituteForJustice 5,372 views
- 2:35 FREE SPEECH FIGHT: New Orleans Bureaucrats Silence Speech, Tour Guides Fight Backby InstituteForJustice 7,530 views
- 1:34:42 Panel 1: Judicial Engagement in Enforcing Property Rightsby InstituteForJustice 328 views
- 1:34 Justice Kennedy: Individual Mandate Fundamentally Changes the Relationship of the Gov.by mott merkel 26,619 views
- 8:50 FIU professor discusses U.S. Supreme Court, Obama's healthcare lawby FloridaInternational 1,222 views
- 1:00:05 Sovereign Freeman Gordon Hall Pt 1 of 17 on Contracts, Law, Court, Judgementsby VerifiedNews 22,216 views
- 3:18 Obama: Individual Health Insurance Mandate 'Should Not Be Controversial'by CNSNews 4,042 views
- 10:47 22. Contracts: Duressby Aaron Dewald 868 views
- 1:24:16 Panel: Whose Constitution? The People, Political Movements, and the Courtsby RWUEDU 213 views
- 23:48 Elizabeth Price Foley Discusses the Tea Party Movementby catoinstitutevideo 1,692 views
- 1:31 Speaker Boehner on the Unconstitutional ObamaCare Mandateby TeamBoehner 3,071 views
- 10:00 California Redevelopment Agencies Abused Their Powers & Should Never Returnby InstituteForJustice 5,757 views
- 8:13 Justice Scalia Annoyed Prop 8 DOMA Supreme Court Hearingby PeoplesUnderground 10,417 views
- 9:16 Is Health Law's Individual Mandate Constitutional? Legal Scholars Debateby PBSNewsHour 1,309 views
- 1:02 Obama against the individual mandate to buy insuranceby whitehousebrief 4,696 views
- 18:48 ObamaCare: Real reason Republicans hate itby huckathome 6,597 views
- 5:18 Businessman Faces Backlash After Appearing on Obama's Enemies Listby The Heritage Foundation 31,806 views
- 6:43 Why Obama's Healthcare Mandate Will Failby Stefan Molyneux 8,842 views
- Loading more suggestions...