Hiding the "Hide the Decline," featuring Greenman3610

Global Warming Alarmists are attempting to Hide the "Hide the Decline." It is a very serious issue, as outlined in the links below and in this video.

American Thinker: http://www.tinyurl.com/HideTheDeclineDetails

Moberg Figures: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v433/n7026/suppinfo/nature03265.html

Lindzen Lecture: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sHg3ZztDAw

On Briffa: http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7168

This is a response to Peter Sinclair's Climate Crock of the Week

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• ClimateGate
• Climate
• Change
• Global
• Warming
• Al
• Gore
• Hide
• the
• Decline
• Peter
• Sinclair
• Lee
• Doren
• HowTheWorldWorks
• Crock
• of
• Week

[extremophile]

It's amazing how such videos remain online to this day, with no retraction, despite all being clarified to the point that anyone who follow the non-fox/real news is tired of hearing what it was really all about. I can't decide whether it's good, as it's effectively the deniers making clowns of themselves for anyone with a dim of skepticism, or it's bad, as it speaks volumes about how so many people are so easily fooled by anyone who press the right buttons...

[guy1481]

1. You admit that proxies are imperfect measures of temperature. If this is the case the "trick" (which is a common statistical practice) done to the curves should make the data more useful, not less.

2. "hide the decline" was in reference specifically to tree-ring data. You imply that everything we know about the climate from 1000-1800AD is based on tree-ring data, when this is certainly not the case. 

[tnekkc]

Warmers are suckers.

Believing in the global warming scam is so 2000.

[uknowispeaksense]

@muskratist propaganda v science. science ftw.

[muskratist]

The proof of how peer review was highjacked by the IPCC is pretty hard to deny-unless you are a denier-which global warming screamers call anyone who doubts them? As to the claim that no "real scientists thought we were threatened by man-made global cooling" in the 70s-the chief advocate of that [and forced population control,even in the US] is John Holdren,Obamas science Czar today.

[Moreviolent]

I like how you used other peoples misinformation in your video to misrepresent what those emails actually said. But hey, why do your own research when you can just borrow someone else's. Who cares whether its factual, right?

[TurboDally]

"Al Gore...his CO2 footprint is 30x"

Some sell sugar pills with no active ingredient in them to those in need of medical assistance, yet don't use those pills themselves. We call them con artists, fraudsters, etc.

"Look, if someone is saying there's a problem, but doesn't act like there's a problem, then there's probably no problem."

Another possibility:

THEY DON'T CARE- They just want to make a buck, invent a BS "solution" (CO2 tax) that diverts us from creating REAL solutions (renewables).

[WarEagle8055]

Please stop with the warming alarmism all you warmers out there. Your high priests aren't even pretending to believe it anymore. Look at Al Gore. With his multiple mansions and world travel he has a carbon footprint about 30 times that of the average person. He's like a gun control activist who collects assault rifles. Look, if someone is saying there's a problem, but doesn't act like there's a problem, then there's probably no problem. No one cares about global warming anymore. You lost. Next.

[Ranillon]

@fishblades "The best part about global warming is in the 70s the same people were predicting an ice age."

That is a complete, utter myth. Only a few people speculated about possible cooling and it never came close to being the consensus. By comparison, global warming is a well proven theory that is supported by the vast majority of people in the field and has as a result become the overwhelming scientific consensus.