Re: My magnet motor ideea

This is a reply video to:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS1AqTIyJHI

Wherein I refute the claim that a miracle has occurred!

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• free
• energy
• over
• unity
• overunity
• magnet
• motor
• power
• generator
• electricity
• magic
• Joules

[yousmoke1]

you freakin alkie

[plopo404]

LOL.. I saw the video and the rattle alone from unbalanced design would cause more friction and energy loss on his system. It is possible to achieve a more efficient motor than induction motors. Yet, exceeding 95% is impossible. You encounter frictional losses which are impossible to overcome.

The most efficient to my knowledge are german perm-motors (comp name) or Agni Lynch PM motors both being axial gap brushless motors. Brushed motors have a loss of 5-10% depending on brush composition.

[Desertphile]

"You are attempting to redefine wors that cannot be redefined"

Talk to yourself in your own channel, nut.

"A theory is just that a theory."

Idiot.

"it isn't reality or Einstien's theories would be facts which they are not!"

All theories are facts; theories are made up of facts. That's what theories are: bodies of facts.

[jbignes5]

I am not redefining anything those are definitions taken from trusted sites that deal with defenition of words. Like websters and psysics sites. You are attempting to redefine wors that cannot be redefined. A theory is just that a theory. it isn't reality or Einstien's theories would be facts which they are not! Any highschool student would know that moron.

[Desertphile]

"Speculation of observations of the theorist while watching an experiment."

No. A theory is a body of facts that explains an observed phenomena. You do not get to redefine words.

"Systematically organized knowledge applicable in a relatively wide variety of circumstances, especially a system of assumptions, accepted principles, and rules of procedure devised to analyze, predict, or otherwise explain the nature or behavior of a specified set of phenomena"

[jbignes5]

A theory by definition AS I STATED by websters and official physics definitions is Speculation of observations of the theorist while watching an experiment. They are not facts otherwise you would just call the theory a fact and it isn't! What is speculation by definition:

A conclusion, opinion, or theory reached by conjecture.

Reasoning based on inconclusive evidence; conjecture or supposition. Learn moron learn. Go back to highschool.

[Desertphile]

"Bot are great sources on what the new theories are headed. These are not facts...."

Theories are facts, idiot.

[jbignes5]

Try reading up on Tom Bearden or Edward Leedskalnin. Bot are great sources on what the new theories are headed. These are not facts but actual observations of what is happening. Both have done extensive experiments on the subject and have come to some surprising theories that contradict current dogma..

[Desertphile]

"...and embrace the new theories as they are written....."

Okay, I give up: What "new theories" are you talking about?

Free energy is impossible.

[jbignes5]

Be it as it may you are the one who is an IDIOT! Either educate yourself or get off the bandwagon and embrace the new theories as they are written, not your interpretation of thiers. In fact why don't you learn by experience and experiment like the rest. Unless the only reason you are doing this banter is to get a certain rub out of people so they pay attention to you. Either way you are the one who looks like a fool.