Stephen Eric Bronner is a distinguished professor of political science and a member of the graduate faculty in comparative literature and German studies at Rutgers University. He is the senior editor of Logos: A Journal of Modern Society and Culture and the author of many books, including Imagining the Possible: Radical Politics for Conservative Times; Of Critical Theory and Its Theorists; and Socialism Unbound. Author: Reclaiming the Enlightenment: Toward a Politics of Radical Engagement (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004). Stephen Eric Bronner (b. 19 August 1949) is a noted political philosopher and Professor (II) of Political Science, Comparative Literature, and German Studies at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States. A prolific writer, Bronner has published over 25 books and 200 journal articles. Born in New York City, New York, United States on 19 August 1949, Bronner earned a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) at City College of New York, spent a year at the Universität Tübingen in Germany on a Fulbright-Hays Fellowship in 1973, and completed his Master of Arts (M.A.) and Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Political Science from the University of California, Berkeley in 1972. He has been employed at Rutgers University since 1976, and has held visiting professor positions at the New School for Social Research (1989), and most recently at the Universität Leipzig (1998). A contributor to many scholarly journals, including New Politics, Political Theory, Social Research and Telos, Bronner has edited and written several books in the fields of contemporary political theory, biography, history, and culture and is the winner of the Michael A. Harrington Prize for his 1991 book, Moments of Decision: Political History and the Crises of Radicalism.. He currently is the Senior Editor of Logos: A Journal of Modern Society and Culture, and on the editorial boards of the journals New Political Science, X-Alta (France) and Eszmelet (Hungary). He also appears frequently on Iranian News TV Press TV.
The interviewer isn't that bad. He shows he is really interested...
BiznizTrademark 1 year ago
This interview is annoying to watch. The interviewer talks way too much and keeps interrupting his guest. I would actually like to hear what the guest has to say.
Santarchy 2 years ago
Channer ruins this interview. I'm a former student and huge fan of Bronner's but Channer must take up forty of the fifity-eight minutes of this show. Channer is like a Charlie Rose without a brain. Just as Bronner is about to expand and articulate an idea Channer interupts destroying any coherence to the discussion. Watching Bronner keeping his cool is entertaining. You're waiting for Bronner to loose it but unfortunately he can't becuase he's promoting his book on the englightenment.
mosesmilch 3 years ago
You should get to know more people.
Xenu 3 years ago
The guest is my professor, one of the smartest men I have ever known
jf505150 3 years ago
i would really appreciate it if the host would just SHUT THE FUCK UP and let his guest speak. his manners are atrocious.
his willingness to go off on a tangent and namedrop to show his knowledge of a subject are embarrassing and make him seem senile at times.
this is EXACTLY the reason why there is no Left and the Right simply has to give any coalescing leftist movement time and space to hang it itself: everyone wants to have the floor and speak. ALL THE TIME!
pitiful.
jcarvalho123456 3 years ago
Awesome show! Seems like everyone claims to be carrying the torch of the enlightenment. The enlightenment started as a revolutionary concept and will forever be revolutionary by definition.
PuppyHate 4 years ago