Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problem 7 End of the Lies pt. 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,165
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 17, 2009

Radiation VII has become such a behemoth project, I've decided to upload each part seperately, until it is completed. The lies are so numerous, as well as continual information coming to light in the field, that blows the propagandist's lies out of the water, and deep into the radioactive space beyond.

ALL NASA FOOTAGE USED IN THIS FILM IS PUBLIC DOMAIN. THE USE OF ANY COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL IS USED UNDER THE GUIDELINES OF "FAIR USE" IN TITLE 17 § 107 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE. SUCH MATERIAL REMAINS THE COPYRIGHT OF THE ORIGINAL HOLDER AND IS USED HERE FOR THE PURPOSES OF EDUCATION, COMPARISON, AND CRITICISM ONLY. NO INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IS INTENDED.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (un4g1v3n1)

  • I think it's bizarre given we saw the rocket launch and astronauts regularly space walk that people would suggest that the moon landings were faked. Moon landing hoax theory's include:

    1/ You can't travel to the moon because space is a vacuum and you would have nothing to thrust against.

    2/ The hidden Mickeys theory: Moon rocks were made by Disney and resemble Disney characters.

    The floors yours guys,try to convince me otherwise!

  • @Intraverseneptune I see you'll ignore the topic at hand in the video, since any argument about radiation in space bieing okey fucking dokey is quickly dismissed with numbers from EE Kovelev....

    Nice try though with the weak bullshit created by those who try to discredit real Apollo fraud research!!

  • Galactic Cosmic Rays, from wikipedia: The radiation environment of deep space is very different from that on the Earth's surface or in low earth orbit, due to the much larger flux of high-energy galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), along with radiation from solar proton events (SPEs) and the radiation belts. If you attempt to pass through the Van Allen belts without electromagnetic or equivalent shielding, you are dead. Once you get past the VAB, the radiation only increases. No moon landing.

  • @Daddyo930 Ah, the refreshing words of truth. It's only a matter of time before NASA has to come clean! I think they are waiting for the rest of the apollo astronuts to kick the bucket first...You know, save them from the same shame experienced by Milli Vanilli! Or, they may just see how long the majority of the public can remain ignorant and ripe for the plucking....

  • @Daddyo930 Umm, they had shielding when they went to the moon.

  • @ShowtimeSPL Nice umm....It shows the mental pause you must have required to try and sell that load of crap the propagandists have been trying to sell for years now. In truth, if one listens to credible radiation experts, willing to talk about the additional danger one would face trying to navigate space in an ALUMINUM CRAFT. Eleanor Blakely educates those ignorant of the dangers of aluminum as a shield. Fragmentation! Radioactive Moon Killer Electrons. Try googling them!

Top Comments

  • "That you're incapable of seeing your personal brainwash is indicative of how complete it is."

    What a great quote!! I'm gonna use that! : )

  • I like this video, thanks.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Dr Brian Cox on Faking the Moon Landings
see all

All Comments (39)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Intraverseneptune Theory 1: You don't need anything to thrust against - thats complete bollocks - its one of Newtons laws that says if you push something at a high speed backwards, the object doing the pushing will go the other way - Harrier jump jets take off in the same way, seen as they don't push off the floor once they are airbourne - they use the opposite force from the jets thrusting the air out to move. Theory 2: Anyone with a brain can see it's crap.

  • @un4g1v3n1 Ive just seen the video about the rock given to the dutch prime minister by Armstrong that was proven to be a petrified piece of wood. This is the hardest evidence I've seen yet for a hoax.

    What purpose would Nasa have for faking it though?

  • @WeenieManX

    Van Allen was a pioneer who did not know anything more because technology was being developed. Besides he was told to "SHUT UP"!

  • @BjornPalmen Okay, you finally watched the video, and yet you remain ignorant, and unwilling to question the Apollo Fairy Tale story...

    Do you prefer ignorance and lies over truth? Do you still believe in Santa as well?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more