Stukas (1941) - part 2

Stukas (1941) - directed by Karl Ritter.

Luftdrucksirenen. Jericho-Trompete. Jerichotrompeten. Trompeten von Jericho. "Trumpets of Jericho", Jericho trumpet. Jerichosirene. Air pressure siren. trompeta de jericó.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• Wehrmacht
• Luftwaffe
• Stuka
• Ju-87
• Junkers
• dive
• bomber
• sturzkampfflugzeug
• Zweiten
• Weltkrieg

[Sankthirsch]

yes...computer animated...in 1941...=)

[VanDragul]

also abgesehen davon das dieser film zu propaganda zwecken gemacht wurde find ich ihn gar nicht schlecht...

[27776633]

Langweilig.

Trotzdem wenn ich nachdenke und zwischen nazi propaganda oder werbung im fernsehen entscheiden könnte, ich wűrde die propaganda nehmen....

[Domenic535]

@42STUKA That's because it's a bomber, not a fighter. Same thing would happen to any other bomber.

[killabazilla]

Directed by Eli Roth and Alois von Eichberg, produced by Frederick Zoller and Quentin Tarantino, special effects by Sgt. Hugo Stiglitz & Shoshanna featuring Lt. Aldo Raine. Voice & accent trainer: Col. Hans Landa. That's how it should be.

[87jesiak]

that is some crappy CGI in the background

[notaire2]

Considering it was a movie, the direct diving style without sliding sideways seems a bit unnatural.

[RDJ1109]

@eotto2001 No they didn't. The Stuka was already considered obsolete by the start of the war. Non retractable landing gear was one of the many reasons why.

[42STUKA]

The philosophical aspect of the Stuka as a war machine is legend. A killer dedicated to one item only, tactical dive- bombing, with relatively little regard for it's own defense...but I I know rear gunners took some of the 'enemy' out. But bring in a Spitfire, Mustang, big fat Thunderbolt or Black Widow...and, really, I am very happy to be an American!

[bwild61]

@eotto2001 Nope!

[eotto2001]

Did they not have retractable landing gear???

[meccarian]

Hey, Czech subtitles! I was all like WTF! :D