See the problem that this video dont solve is that to let you know that their is a difference to TAX the rich in a good economy and TAX the rich in a bad economy! BIG DIFFERENCE! Cant tax the rich in a bad economy, i DEFINITELY heard Mccain speak on that!
I never asked for no taxes. I understand that having no taxes is impossible. Taxing the rich has a trickle down effect which ends up being less productive than taxing growth. Im wealthy enough to be concerned about Obamas tax plan.
You sure picked a great username. It suits you well.
Your comment is incorrect. ALthough no taxes would be the stupid, its impossible with the amount of people we have.
For the same reason we can never be a truely democratic country we can never be truely free of taxes.
And thats fine. No one wants no taxes. They want reasonable taxes. And taxing the richest 2% is fine with me. Stop being sycophantic to the rich...you are NOT in their club as much as you think you are.
BARACK-N-HOOD..STEAL FROM THE RICH GIVE TO THE POOR!!!! WHY DO THE RICH GET TAX BREAKS AND THE PEOPLE THAT WORK 2 or 3 JOBS JUST TO KEEP THEMSELVES FROM STRUGGLING DON'T?? I JUDT DONT GET IT.. SOOO MANY PEOPLE BITCH ABOUT HIS ECONOMIC VIEWS BUT ARE ALSO GOING TO BENIFIT FROM IT... I JUST DONT GET IT
Corporate socialism works if the people running the corp are fair and regulated. When they are not, we get what we have now: an economy on the verge of destruction. If the lower bracket have more money, corporations will do better, because people will be buying more. Trickle Up Economics. In the end, it has to be balanced with either pholosophy. Everything would work perfectly, if people wouldn't fuck it up.
Don't get me wrong. I thank my lucky starts that I'm in the higher bracket, but my livelihood is very much dependent on people on the lower bracket being able to afford what I sell. If I have to pay a little more so they can afford a little more, I'll go along.
Please you know better than that. You know that when corporations do well EVERYONE DOES WELL. When they grow the gov. gets more rev. When they grow they give to charity more. When they grow they employ more people. When they grow they push tech. forward.
Corporate socialism (not that i believe in that phrase) would be FAR BETTER than populous socialism.
Maybe. But McCain's plan isn't any better. If the choice is corporate socialism or populous socialism, I'll side with the people. I'll give "trickle up economics" a try.
BAM!
crazyassailant 1 year ago
See the problem that this video dont solve is that to let you know that their is a difference to TAX the rich in a good economy and TAX the rich in a bad economy! BIG DIFFERENCE! Cant tax the rich in a bad economy, i DEFINITELY heard Mccain speak on that!
bigstU25 3 years ago
I never asked for no taxes. I understand that having no taxes is impossible. Taxing the rich has a trickle down effect which ends up being less productive than taxing growth. Im wealthy enough to be concerned about Obamas tax plan.
You sure picked a great username. It suits you well.
MeLikeGoFast 3 years ago
Your comment is incorrect. ALthough no taxes would be the stupid, its impossible with the amount of people we have.
For the same reason we can never be a truely democratic country we can never be truely free of taxes.
And thats fine. No one wants no taxes. They want reasonable taxes. And taxing the richest 2% is fine with me. Stop being sycophantic to the rich...you are NOT in their club as much as you think you are.
sofuckingdumb 3 years ago
BARACK-N-HOOD..STEAL FROM THE RICH GIVE TO THE POOR!!!! WHY DO THE RICH GET TAX BREAKS AND THE PEOPLE THAT WORK 2 or 3 JOBS JUST TO KEEP THEMSELVES FROM STRUGGLING DON'T?? I JUDT DONT GET IT.. SOOO MANY PEOPLE BITCH ABOUT HIS ECONOMIC VIEWS BUT ARE ALSO GOING TO BENIFIT FROM IT... I JUST DONT GET IT
bryenb05 3 years ago
john mcCain=hypocrite
NanoNorCal707 3 years ago
Corporate socialism works if the people running the corp are fair and regulated. When they are not, we get what we have now: an economy on the verge of destruction. If the lower bracket have more money, corporations will do better, because people will be buying more. Trickle Up Economics. In the end, it has to be balanced with either pholosophy. Everything would work perfectly, if people wouldn't fuck it up.
cipaul 3 years ago
Don't get me wrong. I thank my lucky starts that I'm in the higher bracket, but my livelihood is very much dependent on people on the lower bracket being able to afford what I sell. If I have to pay a little more so they can afford a little more, I'll go along.
cipaul 3 years ago
Please you know better than that. You know that when corporations do well EVERYONE DOES WELL. When they grow the gov. gets more rev. When they grow they give to charity more. When they grow they employ more people. When they grow they push tech. forward.
Corporate socialism (not that i believe in that phrase) would be FAR BETTER than populous socialism.
In populous socialism EVERYONE LOESE.
MeLikeGoFast 3 years ago
Maybe. But McCain's plan isn't any better. If the choice is corporate socialism or populous socialism, I'll side with the people. I'll give "trickle up economics" a try.
cipaul 3 years ago