Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Cooler Heads with Dr Richard Lindzen on Cap and Trade pt 1 of 6

Cooler Heads with Dr Richard Lindzen on Cap and Trade pt 1 of 6  
 
Customize

More From: therightscoop

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
43 ratings
Sign in to rate
11,040 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (24)   Options

Loading...
Visfen (2 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
No, that is not true. If you measure from 98 it has been getting cooler, not warmer.

Sure, i bet you 10 000 next year will be even cooler.

You clearly know nothing, because this has all been explained by El Nino.



And further on, all you morons out there who blame the oil lobby. Get this: they will MAKE MORE MONEY if cap and trade is in place.

It's like you people don't even bother to look up anything yourself, you just make up shit as you go, as you are doing now.
hamnose (17 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
There are warm and cool cycles. We are in a cool cycle. 1998 was the hottest year on record, then 2005 was even hotter. I am willing to bet that next year will be even hotter simply looking at the graph. Also I am told that El Nino is starting up.

The only conspiracy are pr firms in the employ of Saudi princes, Russian oligarchs and Texas oilmen who are politicizing this.

And it isn't honest to characterize the scientists as alarmist. Most are simply trying to make sense of phenomena.
hamnose (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Create a concept and reality leaves the room. Yeah like the concept of a vast unpaid conspiracy creating the hoax of "climate change" and the reality of the data forced out of the room. So if you got a phd all you have to do is call somebody somewhere a Nazi and voila, that's your research paper. But that's like the pot vs kettle. Didn't Mussolini say a better name for fascism would be corporatism? Rave on corporate shill. Looks like next year will be the hottest year on record. What me worry?
Visfen (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Looks like? According to what exactly?

It's not a conspiracy, it is simply that scientists support the AGW because it helps them. The social science of science, I recommend reading "The Golem".
TheLotusMantis (6 days ago)
Comment removed by author
PikeSdream (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
# Revkin quotes von Storch as saying it is time to toss the Hockey Stick . Back in 2004.(1096382684)
Funkhouser says hes pulled every trick up his sleeve to milk his Kyrgistan series. Doesnt think its productive to juggle the chronology statistics any more than he has.(0843161829)
Wigley discusses fixing an issue with sea surface temperatures in the context of making the results look both warmer but still plausible. (1254108338)
CRU searchable database of the leaked info at eastangliaemails
PikeSdream (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Tom Wigley tells Mann that a figure Schmidt put together to refute Monckton is deceptive and that the match it shows of instrumental to model predictions is a fluke. Says there have been a number of dishonest presentations of model output by authors and IPCC.(1255553034)

CRU searchable database of the leaked info at eastangliaemails
PikeSdream (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Jones tells Mann that he is sending station data. Says that if McIntyre requests it under FoI he will delete it rather than hand it over. Says he will hide behind data protection laws. Says Rutherford screwed up big time by creating an FTP directory for Osborn. Says Wigley worried he will have to release his model code. Also discuss AR4 draft. Mann says paleoclimate chapter will be contentious but that the author team has the right personalities to deal with sceptics.(1107454306)
LemonJoose (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
+5
Marked as spam
Richard Lindzen and other scientists who blew the whistle on the lack of evidence to support global warming alarmism deserve Nobel prizes for being willing to speak up despite the all the attempts to muzzle and discredit them for simply for pointing out the weakness of the evidence that was being used to support a political agenda and vast abd expensive public policy decisions.
Martintfre (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
The envirogate that just spashed upon the scene where some hacker gathered the e-mails from a cabal of the top IPPC climate scientist.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.