Mitchell Wing Taxi Test
Loading...
Loading...
1,843
Loading...
Uploader Comments (GeezerRay)
see all
All Comments (6)
-
With the recommended prop and reduction drive you should get 150 lbs of static thrust. As designed should take about 150' for takeoff.
-
Looks she needs too much distance to takeoff. As much as a Cessna Grand Caravan does. How many horsepowers used in engine ?
-
Cool. It seems that all the links on the internet to the ameriplanes website are dead. Are they still in business? Where does one go to get one of these things?
Loading...
2:15
Mitchell Wing B-10 Ultralightby OldChuckie3,840 views- 0:42
Mitchell wing B10 approaching Siljansnäsby Hoverwing20081,714 views
- 3:59
Jet Engine On Ultralight - Mitchell Wing B-10 JFS100by jimmbecker20,554 views
- 0:31
Extreme Fly Fishingby tinika2157,145 views
- 2:25
Mitchell A-10 ultralight, experimental lightsport, amateur built aircraft.by ultralightnews5,548 views
- 2:22
Mitchell wing U2 experimental motor gliderby Hoverwing200839,782 views
- 5:38
MITCHELL U2 aile volante de JBMODELby Manu44863,472 views
- 1:08
FlyingWingFlightby mtargetid12,512 views
- 0:52
Mothership flying wingby rhampton19144,783 views
- 0:23
Rigid wing hang glider from about 1972by vintagemxr22,965 views
- 2:16
Mitchell P 38 Lightning ultralight, experimental aircraft.by ultralightnews18,016 views
- 0:21
THE DREAM CLASSICby vulture333153,286 views
- 0:42
Human Powered Helicopterby Jonrobrt905,388 views
- 0:09
MVI Bob flyng Mitchellwing.aviby cstrough926 views
- 0:55
Benny Halbertby tatauin21,680 views
- 4:22
Mitchell Wing U2 - test flightby Hoverwing2008488 views
- 9:45
Wreckage of Crashed B-25 Mitchell Bomber - Part 1by gchicalo308,590 views
- 7:50
Horten Nurflügel (Flying Wing) Panek Ultralight 10by horten21st16,404 views
- 9:23
Spitfire, the legend, the facts and its opponent (2 of 5)&fmt=18by Olfux67,188 views
25hp. But the prop is inefficient. (Small diameter, high speed.) So it takes 400' to take off, so what? This video is a taxi test, I wasn't pushing it.
Plane has since been sold.
GeezerRay 2 years ago
Too low thrust...
acharad 2 years ago
You're right. The original prop was a bit better (90 lbs. thrust). This one is about 80. Climb rate was a few hundred ft./min., better in the winter. Never had a problem, though.
GeezerRay 2 years ago