Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Science vs. Religion-Education in America (Dover Case)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,673
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 18, 2009

ID-'Not science': Judge John E. Jones
That would be Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, in which parents in Dover, Pa., took the school board to court over an attempt to make intelligent design part of the science curriculum.

During six weeks in September and October last year, Jones heard wide-ranging testimony featuring legal precedence introduced from dozens of court cases, including from the U.S. Supreme Court.

Then Jones wrote a 139-page decision that made broadcast headlines within 15 minutes of release at 10:30 a.m. on Dec. 20. He concluded from the evidence that intelligent design is creationism repackaged—not science. Making it part of a public school science curriculum would be a violation of the U.S. Constitutions establishment clause, which bars an alliance between church and state.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I like this ANCHOR!!!

  • Religious people have 2 golden rules:

    1. Ignore all rational thought

    2. When forced to face rational thought, refer to rule 1

see all

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There is much more to be done, all around the world, but the US really has a lot of catching up to do. That this was taken to court is ridiculous!

  • @FreeeeS The best I've seen so far on U.S television.

  • “There should be no dogmas in schools, evolution is a dogma” yeah right….

    "Dogma is the established belief or doctrine held by a religion, or by extension by some other group or organization. It is authoritative and not to be disputed, doubted, or diverged from, by the practitioners or believers."

    Evolution, we find new evidence, we adapt/change the theory

    Creationnism/intelligent design bullshit, no evidence, no change, gawd did it, burn in hell…

  • Ahhhhhh....Americans. lol

  • Interviewer is a total dick. Well done.

  • @Gehgevgolol no...

  • I'm saying this even though I think the theory of evolution has more evidence than creationism.

  • Its true that religion has almost no evidence backing it up however when a piece of evidence, scientific evidence comes up supporting creationism, it should not be over looked. The only way our society can advance is if we take found evidence and seriously debate the facts to come to a conclusion. If we didn't we would still believe that the earth is flat. (although if evidence supporting the earth being flat comes up it should be taken seriously).

  • WOW I just can not imagine this debate in FAUX News jajajajjaja great anchor

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more