Age Of The Earth - John Pendleton Debunk 1of4
Uploader Comments (djarm67)
Top Comments
-
Wow, this video has been vote-botted harshly :\
-
Lol, no the evidence does not support a young earth. That's stupid. The earth is 4.5 billion years old.
All Comments (67)
-
besides any scriptorian worth their salt knows that a day of God's time is one thousand years to us. So the "creation" Formation of the earth took nearly six thousand years.
-
Again radiometric dating has to use assumptions that the end element that the radioactive Isotope degrades into had to be known or nonexistent in the dated sample. It means if you have a certain amount of the final element you had to "KNOW" how much was in the sample when it formed.and we have no way of Knowing that.and there are cases of Radiometric, Not carbon, dating that have aged rocks from the lava dome at Mt. St. Helens to be millions of years old, when we all know It erupted in 1980'
-
tell us whewre the bible says that Pi is 3 and where it says the sun revolves around the earth.
-
Wow what happenned to the ratings? Are there a swarm of Christian votebots out there?
-
Using this dating method, I have worked out that Tom Hanks is several hundred years old! If we guesstimate that it takes about 3 years to make a film and then times this by Hanks's filmography. Add about 50 years for his television work, well now you see something pretty spooky is happening...
-
Rational people? You learned your rationale from individuals who cannot defend the dating of anything. Also, Big Bang? Your 'science' is no more scientific than faith-based. You believe these things which are no less improbable than the 'cooky' Bible. Remember that 'science' had to change a lot to arrive at the current dating, and enjoy your sarcasm!
-
What is the point, who cares about the past and who is right and who is wrong about the age of the earth . all that matters is the moment your in and that you are happy !
-
John Pendleton has no business wearing a scientist's lab coat. That does not make him a scientist. He should be wearing a clown suit with a big silver cross on a neck chain! I like to wear Western style hats, but I know that does not make me a cowboy. HEY TAXI! TAXI! Whoops! I thought he was a taxi cab! My mistake! With those big ears of his, he looks like a taxi cab with both front doors hanging open! OK, I really shouldn't make fun of someone with big ears. But he does have a small brain!
-
I know how to solve this evolution vs creationist argument once and for all. All we have to do is convince all the "Christians" to let this clown make all their medications. He is a "chemist" after all. I'm sure with his BS degree he can meet all their needs. I'm sure they wouldn't want their medications coming from the "scientific minority" when they can just go to this guy. I'm sure they'd be happy to give up anything in their lives that was created by scientists and move back into caves.
-
Jesus is not coming again! Not unless he's jacking off!
Nicer labcoat
djarm67 3 years ago 2
There is no evidence to support a global flood approximately 2000BC to 2500BC. Despite what young earth creationist websites tell you they are lying to you. If you are a believer you are left with the following, 1)There was a global flood where virtually every aspect of it was miraclulous and God erased all evidence of it. This indicates a deceptive God. Or 2) This is allegorical
djarm67 3 years ago 4