Walter E. Williams on the Census - Freedom Watch w/ Judge Andrew Napolitano

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
707 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 18, 2010

http://researchris.blogspot.com
http://freedomwatchnews.blogspot.com
http://infowars.com

Watch Richard Gage's 2 hr presentation "9/11: Blueprint for Truth" using the scientific method to show that the 3 WTC towers could NOT have collapsed straight down at near free fall speed because of fires or structural damage. IF YOU ARE A SKEPTIC, THEN THIS VIDEO IS A MUST WATCH.

Click the link below to watch for free:
http://researchris.blogspot.com/2009/07/911-blueprint-for-truth-scientific.html

http://AE911Truth.org 's Mission Statement:

" To research and to disseminate the truth
of the 9/11 collapses of all 3 WTC high-rise buildings
to every architect and engineer. "

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (researchris2)

  • Judge Napolitano is a fifth columnist and a traitor.

  • @loonmaniac can you elaborate a bit more. how is a retired constitutionalist judge a traitor?

    expanding on your thoughts, rather than short snippets bites, can give the reader of these comments, a better understanding of your point of view... and if it has truth behind it, then some may even adopt the point of view you have. other than that, it just says that you disagree w/ him and name calling is used.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @researchris2 I heard him say today that Net Neutrality could be coming to you. That is some Orwellian DoubleSpeak. What Fox wants is no government in their way so they can control everything. Just cause the FDA is not in the constitution doesn't mean it shouldn't exist. You know what would happen if they did away with that completely? Hah. They'd really fuck us. We'd all be on retlin just barely breathing.

  • The constitution does not say we only do a head count! Enumeration has two meanings.  First is "count", Second is "to list". The first census listed the head of household along with the number of people in different age groups m/f. In 1850 congress began asking for a list of names of each person in the home. Until the Supreme Court declares anything more than a head count to be unconstitutional then we must abide by the lower courts decisions, wouldn't you agree?

  • I just heard on Rush Limbaugh's radio show some lady came on and stated to the effect that Article 1 Section 5 of the US Constitution specifically says "the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal" and that this provision being specific whereas the part in the same section says "Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings" is general and trumps the general. "Shall" also Trumps "May".

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more