Catholic Ten Commandments

Hmm, there seems to be a glaring omission here. Something about graven images, I think?
http://www.catholicexodus.org

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• catholic
• church
• vatican
• rome

[1000DaysEvangelism]

Is the church you are referring to in the photo a FILIPINO church in the USA? Because normally this is our problem here in the Philippines.

[catholicexodus]

@1000DaysEvangelism I think it's mostly Hispanic.

[UnblockedOne2]

great post. I was always terrified of catholic churches when I was a kid. I always sat out in the car went I went to my friends' catholic church.

[catholicexodus]

@UnblockedOne2 Good call! lol

[shalimarsgirl]

Thank you for this message. I respect truth and honesty.The historical facts and truths in the Bible are overlooked by millions, and people are content to worship God as they wish, and follow their family faith and traditions without even questioning them. God bless you!

[catholicexodus]

@shalimarsgirl Thank you. I always appreciate the enouragement.

[onemarktwoyou]

@SpiffySteph

Yes the KJV has a problem. 1John5:7 and its addition FORCED by the catholic church "the harlot". Study Erasmus and this addition with the FORGED manuscript they pressured him into including.

[SpiffySteph]

@onemarktwoyou Yes, and who was it who sponsored the new translation of the Bible? The KING JAMES version of the Bible? I think it would be terribly naive to believe that the KJV has no flaws or that it was not influenced by the monarch who needed certain parts to be modified for his own doings.

[SpiffySteph]

Hopefully no Catholic, nor any Christian, would follow blindly in their faith without truly exploring the Holy Bible & Sacred Traditions of the Church. I will pray that you now have the courage to explore the Truth about the first Christian Church, established by Jesus Himself with Peter as the first leader. Hopefully more people will recognize videos like this as the misconceptions that they are, & will realize that the Catholic Church compiled the whole Bible!

[SpiffySteph]

@UnblockedOne2 I'm so sorry to hear that you let your misconceptions and the nay-saying of others keep you from experiencing all the Catholic Church has to offer. I will pray that you now have the courage to explore the Truth about the first Christian Church, established by Jesus Himself with Peter as the first leader. Hopefully more people will recognize videos like this as the misconceptions that they are, & will realize that the Catholic Church compiled the whole Bible!

[onemarktwoyou]

@AmericanBerean

Erasmus found no relief from the conservative catholics. The Council of Trent (1545-1564) branded Erasmus a heretic and prohibited his works. In 1559, Pope Paul IV placed Erasmus on the first class of forbidden authors, which was composed of authors whose works were completely condemned. Which was actually a contradiction, because around 1520 they gave him a text(forged) that was done so poorly he had to correct the forged document before translating.

[AmericanBerean]

@onemarktwoyou Was Erasmus a heretic? I thought he was just a liberal Catholic.

What translations do you have in mind when you imply the English were prohibited from reading the Bible?

I like the KJV (with Apocrypha!), but I like the DRV better. The English they used provides some linguistic context that gets lost in revisions to modern English. NRSV, I like. The online parallel bibles I like for study especially to compare the TR,BM and Alexandrian Greek.

[onemarktwoyou]

@AmericanBerean

part 2 If you don't believe the bible was not to be read my catholics then I suggest you check into the reformation of England. Also translations of Erasmus who was both a catholic scholar and a heretic for the catholics. Thus when I said the KJV was nearly flawless, it was in fact was the catholic church that caused any corruptions in the KJV.

[onemarktwoyou]

@AmericanBerean

Needless to say that the 1610 bible was a poor translation do to its being hurried.Their intent was not the preservation of context.

I hear the KJV translation thing a lot. The KJV had a lot of spelling errors.In which King James fined the printers for. There is no real errors in it.

Believe I tried to find them! I started with the 1984 version of the niv. I wanted to reject the KJV for its old English and my bias against old men especially of that time period.

[AmericanBerean]

@onemarktwoyou The first edition of KJV as well as the DRV had a number of issues, corrected in subsequent revisions. Translations are not inspired.

I don't think there has never been any prohibition on lay people reading an approved translation. Certain bad translations, and other books, have been banned (the "Index"). A prime purpose of Jesus' Church is protection of spiritual children, who might fall for another Gospel preached to them.

[onemarktwoyou]

@AmericanBerean

The RC church rejected the KJV before it was published. They hurried and printed a poor version in the "1610 Catholic Douay English Bible". This is not protecting scripture by printing a version that was considered uninspired.

Also the catholics did not promote bible reading for its people until between 1963-1968. When in fact they decided to become "active" in bible translation. Yes for the very reason they claim "purity". Or as I say promoting corruption.