Jacoby-Shermer debate, 4/10

Thanks, I shall look them up. If you want to read some interesting articles, subscribe to "Scientific American" and "Scientific American: Mind".

yea, i'll definitely take a look at them. i do have to say that i am very busy with 18 credit hours this semester so it might be awhile...prolly summer til i can. but, i will most definitely put it on my list to read up on. ^_^

They are monthly magazines with normal 1 to 3 page articles(with diagrams and pictures) on what ever is current in science. I'm certain that even with a heavy course load, there is always time to read a brief article. It is often refreshing to take a half an hour break away from current studies to read something off your regular topic.

yea, i wish i could say there is always time. i wish i could take a half an hour break....i've already taken a week break haha (stupid on my part) but i have catching up to do while trying to juggle this weeks load with it and i'm going crazier than i already am. (i'm a Christian...i must be crazy! haha. jk)

Are you kidding me?
I'll try and phrase this for your fragile mind to read properly.
It is an infinite regress by YOUR definition of creator. There must always be a creator to create something of complexity (agreed?). Otherwise, if you are to say that something of complexity need not have a creator, then evidently the Universe need not have a creator(wakaremasu ka).

I don't understand what you've just said, it was nonsensical, be more clear. Purpose is a neurological production.