Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Rousseau vs Locke

The philosophies of Locke and Rousseau on Democracy  
 
Customize

More From: lvdanse2

Loading...

QuickList(0)

27 ratings
Sign in to rate
8,367 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (20)   Options

Loading...
j1mmusj4mmus (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Is this the same rousseau who talked of the rural idyll and the noble savage he seems much more civilised in your version
smigersh (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
thank you SO MUCH FOR THIS VIDEO it helped me SO. MUCH. like unbelievably. it cleared up so many ideas. THANK YOU
0bof5 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
this is definitely an incorrect video. john locke seems to be summarized well but rousseau's statements have been taken out context.

for example: he judges (direct) democracy from the perspective of his cite, in which the democracy fullfils the role of the weak government next to the powerful souverain.

also, the generall will is not just the sum of the peoples wills but rather of a metaphysical nature
Guiseppe107 (6 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
ENGLAND (Locke) Vs FRANCE (Rosseau)

Having read text and researched views of scholars who have delved deep into the influence of these two men, many of whom argued against Rosseau whilst commending Locke's legacy, there is no doubt Locke has far greater influence.. his emphasis on personal liberty and the Rights of Property for one.

Result??? ENGLAND WINS
gipcambero (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
LOL Rousseau is swiss. In return Montesquieu and Voltaire were french so it's nonsense to say "England Wins"
shaneho78 (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
good video. however the general will is not merely the sum of the wills of the people. It is rather the will of the people if they were acting as a single organism, which is ambiguous to say the least.
lvdanse2 (7 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
as you said the "single organism" concept is ambiguous. Secondary sources suggested that Rousseau saw this as a sum of the parts
StatusDelirious (7 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Jean Jacques. It's pronounced Jaun - Jauk. Not Gene Jak-es.
asianguy8880 (8 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
huh...
i thought this was about the tv show LOST
funincluded (8 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I've never watched that show, but I know a lot of the characters have the names of philosophers

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.