Message To The Bandung2 Conference
Uploader Comments (BandungPhilosophy)
All Comments (11)
-
white nations don't have racist speakers, they have racist actions. Colonialism was a racist act among other things, The europeans nations actions speak louder than any of their words ever could. Besides Malcolm had a way of oversimplifying things. The point is even though there are white people in the bandung conference countries, USSR USA and Europe were countries that made race and issue among other things like enlsaving other countries
-
@nomadnametab you are a dumbass
-
Ah! Isn't racial harmony a wonderful thing. Dirty racist pig. If a white person expounded so thoroughly full of hate towrds any other race , most white people would shun him and everyone would call for him to be beheaded after having his pubic hair pulled out by the roots. Last time I took anthropology , the Persians, Turks and Arabs , and for that matter the Indo-Pakistanis were caucasians. How's the NAM's anti-west attitude helped them develop? Bite the hand that feeds you and see what happens
-
So then we agree, it wasn't a meeting of black people. It was a meeting of Africans and Asians. El Shabazz misspoke.
-
is that Zhou Enlai?
Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Syria, and Saudi Arabia were represented at Bandung. Do Iranians, Iraqis, Turks, Syrians, and Saudis look like black folks to you?
impCaesarAvg 2 years ago
I dont quite understand your point? Please clarify...
BandungPhilosophy 2 years ago
Didn't you hear Malik El Shabazz? He said that Bandung, in 1954, was a unity meeting of black people. The white man, the enemy, wasn't invited. So, are Iranians, Iraqis, Turks, Syrians, and Saudis black?
impCaesarAvg 2 years ago
I think that what Malik El Shabaz was trying to point out was that black people could organise, that unity was occuring within "non-white" communities including black people from all over the world and that the reason this could happen, why they were able to come together was because the "oppresor" was not allowed or able to get in the way. I also do not think that a man who had read so much and acquired so much knowledge would not know the colour of, say, an arab man?!
BandungPhilosophy 2 years ago
He also goes on to say that "all of them were either Black, Brown, Red or Yellow"
(at 1:26 - 1:31)
BandungPhilosophy 2 years ago