@RockyX456 It's ironic that you're lecturing people about subjectivity vs. objectivity when, judging by the fact you're asking for someone to give "supporting evidence" of their own purely subjective opinion, you obviously don't understand the difference yourself. It's also not surprising that someone with such warped logic would defend a television program that has become synonymous with reaching a point of sheer absurdity, or "jumping the shark".
@RockyX456 Ha! Classic ad populum fallacy. So by your "logic", if some people watch something on TV, that fact alone would make anyone who thought it was bad, dumb, mindless, or whatever, intrinsically wrong? And that's your "strong argument"? Wow. Let me guess - you probably weren't on the school debating team.
Supporting evidence? LOL! It's called an opinion, you dolt. That's like asking for "supporting evidence" if someone says they don't like a certain color or flavor of ice cream. Weak.
@kqr573v2 Right if this show was bad on "so many levels" (note the lack of supporting evidence. What a "strong argument.") then the audience wouldn't have watched it for 10 seasons long. Again, you clearly cannot distinguish the difference between objectivity and subjectivity like many people.
@RockyX456 It's ironic that you're lecturing people about subjectivity vs. objectivity when, judging by the fact you're asking for someone to give "supporting evidence" of their own purely subjective opinion, you obviously don't understand the difference yourself. It's also not surprising that someone with such warped logic would defend a television program that has become synonymous with reaching a point of sheer absurdity, or "jumping the shark".
RManBB2010 1 day ago
@RockyX456 Ha! Classic ad populum fallacy. So by your "logic", if some people watch something on TV, that fact alone would make anyone who thought it was bad, dumb, mindless, or whatever, intrinsically wrong? And that's your "strong argument"? Wow. Let me guess - you probably weren't on the school debating team.
Supporting evidence? LOL! It's called an opinion, you dolt. That's like asking for "supporting evidence" if someone says they don't like a certain color or flavor of ice cream. Weak.
kqr573v2 1 day ago
@kqr573v2 Right if this show was bad on "so many levels" (note the lack of supporting evidence. What a "strong argument.") then the audience wouldn't have watched it for 10 seasons long. Again, you clearly cannot distinguish the difference between objectivity and subjectivity like many people.
RockyX456 3 days ago
@ivegotalongdong You clearly do not understand subjectivity vs objectivity. Your opinion does not equate to the truth.
RockyX456 3 days ago
That show was breathtakingly bad on so many levels. I can't imagine grown adults not being embarrassed to be associated with such crap.
kqr573v2 4 days ago
@ivegotalongdong then why did it ran for many years?
Okonkwo009 5 days ago
@Okonkwo009 :
show was TERRIBLE
ivegotalongdong 6 days ago
@ivegotalongdong come again?
Okonkwo009 2 weeks ago
DO THE FONZIE???? OMFG - no wonder why this show jumped the shark
ivegotalongdong 3 weeks ago
i remember when this show was on it was so cool back then
ubsme2 1 month ago