I love how the religious are celebrating this as some sort of victory because he had to take a while to consider a question and choose this moment, and choosing now as the time to fill the comments section with childish insults of 'idiot' and other comments questioning his intelligence, when they COMPLETELY ignore the times he's utterly destroyed religious arguments without hesitation. Cherry picking at its finest, although I'd expect nothing less from the proponents of ignorance...
@lxUn1c0 Perhaps, but the information in the genome does increase by various means. Be sure to google the "nylonase enzyme" for a definite example of new information in the world's genome. HINT: nylon is a very recently developed man-made polymer which does not exist in nature.
@eleutheromaniac If that question is based on a fundamental misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the theory and processes of evolution, then yes, it is highly deceptive (read: propaganda). The clip shows the point in the interview when Dawkins realized he was being interviewed by Creationists with an agenda. The question tries to imply that the theory revolves around the principle of increasing information in the genome, which it doesn't.
Idiot! If you think a 53 second video with crappy editing and graphics will rescue that imbecile you are wrong. Dawkins is an idiot, let me ask you a question. Have you really read any of his books completely cover to cover.
And for the idiot bellow MrCooIUS, "creationists don't ask questions" what the hell do you think the interviewer was asking? Boy are you stupid.
@videogamenostalgia Haha, I was gonna leave a comment like this, but you're just spot on so I'm not gonna bother :) Have a nice day.
simmo93 1 week ago
I love how the religious are celebrating this as some sort of victory because he had to take a while to consider a question and choose this moment, and choosing now as the time to fill the comments section with childish insults of 'idiot' and other comments questioning his intelligence, when they COMPLETELY ignore the times he's utterly destroyed religious arguments without hesitation. Cherry picking at its finest, although I'd expect nothing less from the proponents of ignorance...
videogamenostalgia 1 week ago
@lxUn1c0 Perhaps, but the information in the genome does increase by various means. Be sure to google the "nylonase enzyme" for a definite example of new information in the world's genome. HINT: nylon is a very recently developed man-made polymer which does not exist in nature.
Quakeboy02 3 weeks ago
@eleutheromaniac If that question is based on a fundamental misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the theory and processes of evolution, then yes, it is highly deceptive (read: propaganda). The clip shows the point in the interview when Dawkins realized he was being interviewed by Creationists with an agenda. The question tries to imply that the theory revolves around the principle of increasing information in the genome, which it doesn't.
lxUn1c0 1 month ago
@eleutheromaniac Lemme ask a question, its not propaganda at all so don't worry:
Why has Glenn Beck never denied that he raped and murdered a girl in August of 1990?
Now to the point, If you think that a question can't be a source of propaganda, why do you think lawyers are paid?
jackthesavant 1 month ago
lolwut? asking a question is 'creationist propaganda'??? wanna run that by me again?
honestly, this vid only serves to make dawkins look worse than he did in the original.
eleutheromaniac 1 month ago
Idiot! If you think a 53 second video with crappy editing and graphics will rescue that imbecile you are wrong. Dawkins is an idiot, let me ask you a question. Have you really read any of his books completely cover to cover.
And for the idiot bellow MrCooIUS, "creationists don't ask questions" what the hell do you think the interviewer was asking? Boy are you stupid.
Have a nice day :)
TruthDefenders 1 month ago