Donofrio vs. Wells Slated For US Supreme Court Conference
Here is the case in a nutshell. The News Media needs your help! Please read these simple words and explain this to them!
The Framers of the Constitution, at the time of their birth, were British Citizens and thats why the Framers declared that, while they were Citizens of the United States, they themselves were NOT natural born Citizens. Hence their inclusion of the GRANDFATHER CLAUSE in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution:
(Quote) No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the Office of President. (End quote)
Since Barack Obamas father was a Citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obamas birth, then Senator Obama was a British Citizen at birth, just like the Framers of the Constitution, and therefore, EVEN IF, EVEN IF, EVEN IF he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on US soil, he still wouldnt be eligible to be President.
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
On November 19, 2008, the United States Supreme Court scheduled the case for a conference of the nine Justices of the United States Supreme Court.
Could FactCheck.org be providing the most damning evidence in plain sight to support Leos conclusion?
Article: When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdoms dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.s children: British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth. In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.Obamas British citizenship was short-lived. On Dec. 12, 1963, Kenya formally gained its independence from the United Kingdom. Chapter VI, Section 87 of the Kenyan Constitution specifies that:1. Every person who, having been born in Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963 2. Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become, a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963. As a citizen of the UKC who was born in Kenya, Obamas father automatically received Kenyan citizenship via subsection (1). So given that Obama qualified for citizen of the UKC status at birth and given that Obamas father became a Kenyan citizen via subsection (1), it follows that Obama did in fact have Kenyan citizenship after 1963... But the paper failed to note that the Kenyan Constitution prohibits dual citizenship for adults. Kenya recognizes dual citizenship for children, but Kenyas Constitution specifies that at age 21, Kenyan citizens who possesses citizenship in more than one country automatically lose their Kenyan citizenship unless they formally renounce any non-Kenyan citizenship and swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya. Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982. Again, Leo Donofrios case is premised on Barack Obamas citizenship at birth, regardless of what a COLB (certificate of live birth, which isnt the full, vault copy) has to say. And, in theory, it doesnt matter whether or not Barack Obamas citizenship changed a day, month, year or years after he was born; its at birth, according to Leo, that counts. If you will recall from one of Leo Donofrios interviews, he mentioned that even the Founding Fathers had to grandfather themselves into the potentiality of being President, thusly (from Article 2, Section1): or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution Remember: the Founding Fathers were originally born (at birth) in another country, namely (in some cases), England. They were therefore born as His Majestys subjects. And, like Barack Obama, they would have had dual citizenship (for a time) as well! Thats why, according to Leo, they had to put in this clause, else they would have never qualified.
Obama supporters cannot deny that the"change"he promised is looking like the same old game of having "insiders" workingfor the new president elect.Half of his proposed members of the cabinet are Clintons or former Clinton appointees.Obamites willsay weneed experience,this is because Obama has noexperience.Can you see the pattern of backpedling and doublespeak?HE RAN ON CHANGE! He is not in office yet and already bullshitting you!Chicago political machine produced"a good little negro",nice robot.
albermarle19 3 years ago
I remember the 1960's. LBJ launched his "War on Poverty." Been there. Done that. "Redistribution" of wealth is just that. "Hand outs" are a proven failure.
Every moral person should HELP those in need but "hand outs" only PERPETUATE the problem. Jeez! This should be obvious.
opchidexio 3 years ago
Osama Bin Laden in 2012.
Auggie56 3 years ago
lol!
opchidexio 3 years ago