Undercover Voter ID Investigation: You Will Never Guess Which Liberal Groups Are Demanding ID

What's wrong with showing identification when you vote? That's an egregious civil rights violation if you ask the Obama Administration and liberal groups like the Center for American Progress, and the Advancement Project. So what happens if you show up at the front door of these groups without ID? Find out on this PJTV undercover investigation.

See more at http://www.pjtv.com

• Category

  News & Politics

[OneEyedJack1970]

I wonder if the same people who have a problem showing ID to vote have a problem showing one to cash their government check. I doubt it.

[bigbenusa45]

Yep, most liberals are complete hypocrites.

[syndrome1965]

Recent immigrants cannot be Citizens, that process takes years. But either way, good point, to travel country to country one must possess a passport, that is photo ID...

[121intheshade]

Yeah, because anyone who might be in the position of not having a photo ID is more than likely going to be trying to set an appointment with Eric Holder at some point. So your parallel is right on the mark. Great job!

[David Lagesse]

Did I not hear the voice over say "recent immigrants" at 0:35 !!

Yet they can vote and they have no ID, so how did they get to be Citizens without an ID?

Fraud Alert!

[AfghanJude]

1. So is submitting for an absentee ballot, but that doesn't prevent people from voting. Nowhere does the Constitution state that voting isn't supposed to be frustrating, complex, and time-consuming.

3. That is still an opinion. It may not be an opinion originated by you, but it's still an opinion. A fact, in contrast, is that voter fraud, regardless of method, is a felony crime, and it is up to the government to enforce the law and prevent the crime from occurring.

[ArcanaKnight]

2) The cost for implementing these laws is more than you think. For example, the proposed amendment in MN is estimated to cost over $80 million and take 3 years to implement. That's because there's the cost for the "free" IDs, the costs of educating citizens on the new requirements, hiring more election officials, etc.

[ArcanaKnight]

1) Obtaining an ID can easily be a frustrating, complex and time-consuming process that can require the expenditure of an amount of money that is significant for an eligible voter who is indigent

3) Not opinion: Every single state that has investigated the issue (MN, WI, etc) has found it to not be a problem. It's up to the proponents of these laws to show that such fraud is not only a problem, but one that outweighs the burdens these laws would impose, which they have continually failed to do

[AfghanJude]

1. Citizens currently not having a valid photo ID is not a reasonable argument for why they would be incapable of obtaining one for the purpose of voting.

2. The cost would be a drop in the bucket compared to the numerous other government programs which waste money, especially since the equipment is already in place to provide IDs at your local DMV.

3. In-person voter fraud not being a problem is an opinion, not a fact. Learn the difference. Just because you put it in all caps doesn't make it so