Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Why Do They Do This? Debunking 9/11 & Controlled Demolition

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
88,767
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 2, 2007

"Controlled Demolition" of WTC on 9/11 debunked. A very popular website keeps insisting that the World Trade Center was brought down by Controlled Demolition. On that site they show you a picture of a steel column that has been cut. But the steel column was cut by an ironworker during the clean up. You can see a cut just like it being made by an iron worker during the clean up of the WTC.
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2007/04/why-do-they-do-this.html
You can see for yourself that photo 5102 comes from the very same website as photo 5100. So is this the level of honesty of "9/11 Truth" or an indication of how poor their research skills are? How is it they ignore a photo which debunks one they use (5100) when both came from the same website? Do they not know of the existence of photo 5102 or are they suppressing it and playing their readers for fools? See both photos by entering in their numbers at the website: http://hereisnewyork.org/gallery

By the way, WTC1 debris hit WTC7
billbacon, NIST does answer their questions at this FAQ page:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

WTC 7 was severely damaged on the south side of the building and was on fire for about 7 hours
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/09/wtc-7-was-severely-damaged-on...
What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1bm2GPoFfg&feature=PlayList&p=F81BB57...

  • likes, 400 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Blind loyalty caused Germans to follow Hitler's claim of building a Utopia, through 6 yrs. of hell on earth, and the final destruction of Germany. The same mentality rules in Amerika the Blind!

  • @yhenry77 Well then you should know that steel does not have to melt to loose most of it's structural integrity. Which is exactly what happened and made the steel beams buckle and thus colapsing the building.

Video Responses

This video is a response to It's called 'impeachment' IMPEACH THEM NOW!
see all

All Comments (4,051)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @JPDisme fancy coming across you claiming the same shit again lol. Good luck convincing them of the offical story 'dog pile' you'll need it. :3

  • @visionary138

    1- Box cutters can slash unarmed pilots and civilians

    2- Ordinary fires melt (soften) steel and there are numerous examples.

    3- On 911 videos your own eyes can see that the debris fell faster the buildings.

    4- The "architects and engineers" represent 0.04% of all architects and engineers.

    5- Name the laws of physics that were violated on 911.

    6- What University of structural engineering did you attend?

  • if its not an inside job then someone should be jailed for building some fuckin shitty ass skyscrapers then.

  • I love it when truthers claim the mainstream story violates "the laws of physics" when it most certainly does not. It's always the non-physicists that make this claim. If it's so obvious that laws of physics were broken, then how come the world's hundreds of thousands of physicists haven't spoken up about it? Are they all afraid of being assassinated by the CIA? Yeah, sure. That just makes perfect sense.

  • I'M JUST CURIOUS WHICH PART OF THE GOVERNMENT THIS GUY WORKS FOR?

  • Is there a debunk-er with any kind of structural engineering degree, or perhaps passed a high-school physics class. There is no argument that any of 'official story' believer can present, that does not break NUMEROUS 'LAWS' of physics and thermodynamics. You CANNOT BREAK THESE LAWS, Especially with BOX CUTTERS, FIRES, OR AN AIRLINER IMPACTS&EXPLOSION. You FUCKERS ARE DUMB, Well, Bill O"REALLY or DOUCHE Limbaugh. They have only opinions and are characters Playing a role, FOX News LIES. SMARTENup

  • MORON, MORON, MORON that was the next day before anyone cut anything. FUCK man, you are stupid. amazingly dumb, THIS GUY KNOWS LESS THAN NOTHING; IF HE KNEW NOTHING, THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING, AND HE DON'T EVEN THAT.

  • @Howie47 the same mentality rules in the truther movement of the blind.

  • @wollclark Firefighter Eric Lawyer quote: “This should have been the most protected, preserved, over tested, and thorough investigation of a crime scene in world history.. The majority of the evidence was shipped off… How do you investigate a crime when you’ve destroyed all of the evidence? There are National Standards for an investigation.. NIST violated the most basic of the guidelines.. Spoliation of evidence..” AS SEEN ON FIREFIGHTERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH

  • @wollclark Firefighter Eric Lawyer quote: “They [NIST] refused to test for explosives or residue of thermite.. On a routine house fire, if we detect even the slightest use of an accelerant we’re going to test for it when there’s no fatalities.. So to not do it on this, there is no excuse.. Why would we not test if something is hard to do [put bombs in the buildings], that’s the exact reason you need to investigate it.. we need to find out how they did it.” AS SEEN ON FIREFIGHTERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more