Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

The Six Pack Caddie Smack

Reca'nize. 6LPM off the grid. It costs a dime to recharge the batteries. This is the future. Switches are hooked to IGN, and I left the gas on with the engine off as I was distracted with the v...  
 
Customize

More From: EletrikRide

Loading...

Playlist(7)

5:18
0:41
8:38
2:55
6:20
5:43
3:50

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
15 ratings
Sign in to rate
19,295 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (32)   Options

Loading...
MINIBNRR (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
lower the amount of water in the bubbler.
EletrikRide (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Why????
MINIBNRR (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Becuase it will get sucked into the engine when you drive and the car shifts around. The vacuum will also make the water expand and go up into the engine. The bubbler has been tested by me to NOT flashback with just a inch of water. A flashback means your timing is off or engine is damaged. I have revved a healthy engine with HHO to 10K RPMs with no bubbler or flash arrestor. Bubblers can be more trouble than thay are worth.
EletrikRide (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Lowering the bubbler water is something I refuse to endorse. It is wrong and dangerous, no matter what you say about your tests. Sloshing, ingestion? Not a problem at all with my 4" bubbler design. Been running this bubbler design all summer on the Ranger with NO problems - and I keep it 3/4 full. So I will stick to what I know works. I will NEVER EVER run without a bubbler.  Your suggestion is dangerous and should not be heeded under any circumstances.
arkijak (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I own a 1964 Buick Riviera- 425 ci V8, 4bbl carter carb, 3.55 rear axle ratio. I installed 2 w4g cells. Mileage improved from 6.3 MPG to 10 MPG! Added a 3rd cell and mileage jumped to 13.84! Around town! I was able to reset the timing back to original specs. No more pinging and no more dieseling after shutdown. I have added a 4th cell. Would like to get 20 mpg around town.
EletrikRide (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Now imagine what you could do if you had a good cell design instead of the W4G
bouncebackkk (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I have a chevey truck3/4ton with a 350 no CUM,cadildic converter,or oxegen sencers but it does have a holly carb My question is on the six pack caddie smack did you make any engene alterrations to the engene to get tha 88% increase in mpg and if leaning the carb back is need could you help me with some kind of comparison to what you did on your caddie
EletrikRide (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
I never was able to post any numbers on the Caddie, as it is not mine and the owner did not complete testing. On the Ranger, I did nothing more than an ECM reset as I mentioned. You may not need to do anything to a carb model either, but I cannot say for certain yet as I have not tested one.
bouncebackkk (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So if I dont have ECM or the need of a EFIE because it dose not have oxegen sensor so I would have to ajust the carb manualy to lean the air to fuel other wise how else would get better mpg it wood run better but still would not now to ajust without the computer which it dose not have
kerpal2343 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
fear enough, to bad their isn't a third case. I.e. upper case GOD, then their is god (egotistical alien with advanced technology, agreeable terms, a ray gun, and superior medical technology), we need a super lower case. Maybe good, will work.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.