Nassim Haramein 12/45
Top Comments
All Comments (72)
-
"They" most definitely know all of this and much more. It is likely that most "UFO" sightings are test flights of our own military's many technologies that we don't know about. The Nazis were testing anti-gravity UFO-shaped craft in the 30's and 40's and the US just happened to confiscate Nazi scientists and create NASA with them. Werner von Braun is one example of the Nazi - NASA scientist crossover. Gravity manipulation is just one thing that this science makes possible.
-
He compares a ratio of two lengths (length to length i.e. cm / cm = no units) to the Phi Ratio. You can apply the Phi Ratio the same way you can apply ANY ratio to anything (including distance) otherwise, it wouldn't be of much use. So far, the only thing with units of cm that he has utilized is Planck's constant. Nothing "arbitrary" about the unit of centimeters in Planck's constant. Sounds like you performed another wiki/google search here.
-
Does YOUR "basic" information include an education outside of Wiki and Google searches? Gee, I had to take several physics classes in college, yet up to video 12, I haven't had a problem with any of his theorizing. I know several dozen students at a reputable university that took a basic astronomy class and have no clue about astronomy. I again refer to the failure of academia in challenging the idea of several Newtonian laws being broken in the official story of 9/11. Who's reputable?
-
No, "legitimate" is when you are considered a "FELLOW" (actual term in academia) AND you submit your work (that you have completed during your PAID tenure at a RECOGNIZED university alongside other FELLOWS) and then your OTHER fellows peer review the work to make sure that they really are unable to complete the work and grab the credit (damn!). Long gone are the days when an "outsider" could be a major influence in academia (such as Einstein was).
-
To all posters who seem to think they have PhDs in physics:
Since you're all so great at physics and so dependent on institutionalized research & education, please help me resolve this problem.
Two large structures weighing in at over 150,000 tons of steel and concrete are almost completely pulverized during a 12 - 15 second collapse. My point? No establishment physicists want to touch this because they already understand the implications. We see a similar circumstance here.
-
It's funny that you actually think that a group of scientists who have made their entire lives into figuring such things out would actually acknowledge a complete outsider. In fact, this is hilarious! Please define the specific points where a "physics undergraduate" could "see straight through this nonsense" yet not understand the fundamental problems with two 100,000+ ton steel buildings near free falling to complete obliteration.
-
Yeah, this guy's a personality cult, but there's nothing wrong with the current state of society and Hollywood/politics/materialism
. Perhaps it is you who needs to get with the program. Protecting one's ego from the possibility that they don't really understand ANYTHING about reality is a normal reaction to hearing radical theories. Pythagoras as well as Plato had "cults" of followers, yet we still managed to get past that since we still utilize their theories & ideas today. -
This is an ongoing debate within the field of psychology. It is by no means dis-proven, OR proven. Wikipedia seems to be a major source of your information. A good vocabulary and decent writing skills do not make you an expert on multiple subjects.
-
You forget that all scientific theory(emphasis here) requires the same mindset that religious people have. Also, let's not forget how vilified most of history's groundbreaking scientists were. It isn't just a church thing. The church was Europe's head of science during the middle ages and everyone thought that THEIR theories & evidence were fully supportable. They had to threaten excommunication to maintain their stranglehold on science. It seems similar methods are used today.
-
@johnjames1971 dude, it's a personality cult, not a science show. Get with the program.
its all about logic and thinking, this guy mix up a buch of very well known stuff, to get something he wants from it, thats all he does. nothing new here
dumbnetworks 2 years ago 10
They don't like him because he is misleading people, with the aim of making money (15 million to carry on his "research" lol). This stuff only seems important to those who don't already know basic things about physics, fractals and astronomy. He appeals to, and depends upon, peoples ignorance of these topics. Wake up.
indie3 2 years ago 6