lindon larouche, knows exactly what hes talking about , u can be sure of that!!!!! When he claims something, u can be positive that he researched it to the bottom , cause he sure did , make no mistake about that!!! peace!
I believe (in this interview) they were focusing on the issues that WAC and LPAC agree upon. There are some things they could have argued about, but decided to only focus on the real issues, but thanks for pointing out these discrepancies, also WAC (as far as I know) does not support FDR.
I posted another comment that didn't go. Look, he's got 70% of it right, and more of the invention. Read Politically Correct Guide to Great Depression, Constituion, and US History; and you will know 250% more than LaRouche. Your intentions are honorable, your speaker has either other intentions, or misunderstandings. Hamilton wanted a king and British parlament, and huge US debt, funded by a bank. THis guy has no clue on why we fought for sovereignty. Please educate yourself and dismiss this.
5:40, he's wrong. Hamilton wanted a British empire in the US. Tied to Brits. Read Hamilton's Curse. Consitution did NOT create consolidated powers. He has his own view of history, uniquely his own. Read for yourselves, you will find NO proof of LaRouche's historical views of Hamilton, Lincoln, or any of the ROosevelts. Once again, I agree with his sentiment, and 100% of your intentions his facts are wrong.
Thanks for posting this! Great stuff!
MrSalimMilas 8 months ago
blue your very mis-informed we don't do revisionist history just fact's
mactripper420 1 year ago
lindon larouche, knows exactly what hes talking about , u can be sure of that!!!!! When he claims something, u can be positive that he researched it to the bottom , cause he sure did , make no mistake about that!!! peace!
tepstolog 2 years ago
You should read Hamilton's Report on Manufactures
MTL911Truth 2 years ago
I believe (in this interview) they were focusing on the issues that WAC and LPAC agree upon. There are some things they could have argued about, but decided to only focus on the real issues, but thanks for pointing out these discrepancies, also WAC (as far as I know) does not support FDR.
tafaridh 2 years ago
I posted another comment that didn't go. Look, he's got 70% of it right, and more of the invention. Read Politically Correct Guide to Great Depression, Constituion, and US History; and you will know 250% more than LaRouche. Your intentions are honorable, your speaker has either other intentions, or misunderstandings. Hamilton wanted a king and British parlament, and huge US debt, funded by a bank. THis guy has no clue on why we fought for sovereignty. Please educate yourself and dismiss this.
blue42421 2 years ago
5:40, he's wrong. Hamilton wanted a British empire in the US. Tied to Brits. Read Hamilton's Curse. Consitution did NOT create consolidated powers. He has his own view of history, uniquely his own. Read for yourselves, you will find NO proof of LaRouche's historical views of Hamilton, Lincoln, or any of the ROosevelts. Once again, I agree with his sentiment, and 100% of your intentions his facts are wrong.
blue42421 2 years ago