their watts in- watts out are by his terms 1:1 no overunity. but this model he has here is not an overunity device. all he is showing is that they have a circuit diagram/plans that allow you to get 99.9% efficient works from your coils, its up to you to design a motor that turns kenetic energy from the rotor into electricity to create an overunity device. B-emf is what many have considered to be the last big hurdle to creating a overunity device
Also... it must be very difficult to explain your idea to the world, because of different levels of experience, so ill take my hat off to him for that. And he did say about booking a test group. also hmm 100people x ticket to attend demo?
To be honest, im quite sceptical about this. It doesnt seem any different from lots of bedini motors out there, and if so, theres been lots of people experimenting with that and they would have found something. Maybe... he's just found something clever on his scope - and is presenting that as OU. If it works, why not sell a functional product?
@ydeardorff also in their claims they are adding in heat losses and motor movement which is not being collected as a part of their over unity statement, but I still would like to see what their watts in and total watts out and proof to back it up.
i think i finally cracked the idea behind this. Kind of makes me look stupid from my last comment though. They arent selling free energy device/s they are selling/offering schematics/plans to a efficient circuit design, which "could" be used to create a overunity device. They arent selling one made because they cant, they are just selling thelicense to use thir design in your concept. I get it now but still, as far as demo's go this is rather dsconcerning
They need a heck of alot of energy using liquid nitrogen to keep superconductors alof to minimize drag. This guys plexiglass model would produce a hell of alot of drag. even the most well designed motors cannot escape the basic principles. Many motors are good but produce no usable power. he might as well call it fusion energy given his claims it should be able o run off of its own output yes? Then of course with an excess of energy back ino the system it shouldspin out of control. yes?
i find it amusing that people have searched for free engery for decades, yet finally it seems someone manages to create a working concept and they instantly try and commercialise it. Isnt this half the reason (or more) people have searched for free energy besides the benefit to the enviroment haha i find that rather amusing, BUt again this is only relavent if the concept is real
check out my motor ideas all free information . completely free. give information to your fellow man .save the planet.
theonethatgoofs 1 year ago
their watts in- watts out are by his terms 1:1 no overunity. but this model he has here is not an overunity device. all he is showing is that they have a circuit diagram/plans that allow you to get 99.9% efficient works from your coils, its up to you to design a motor that turns kenetic energy from the rotor into electricity to create an overunity device. B-emf is what many have considered to be the last big hurdle to creating a overunity device
lynel1985 2 years ago
read what i posted. it answers all your questions. Im not convinced either.
lynel1985 2 years ago
Also - sorry to harp on but. Protect your contact details people - you never know if you name is being gathered
DiyEcoProjects 2 years ago
Also... it must be very difficult to explain your idea to the world, because of different levels of experience, so ill take my hat off to him for that. And he did say about booking a test group. also hmm 100people x ticket to attend demo?
DiyEcoProjects 2 years ago
To be honest, im quite sceptical about this. It doesnt seem any different from lots of bedini motors out there, and if so, theres been lots of people experimenting with that and they would have found something. Maybe... he's just found something clever on his scope - and is presenting that as OU. If it works, why not sell a functional product?
DiyEcoProjects 2 years ago
@ydeardorff also in their claims they are adding in heat losses and motor movement which is not being collected as a part of their over unity statement, but I still would like to see what their watts in and total watts out and proof to back it up.
LightsJester 2 years ago
i think i finally cracked the idea behind this. Kind of makes me look stupid from my last comment though. They arent selling free energy device/s they are selling/offering schematics/plans to a efficient circuit design, which "could" be used to create a overunity device. They arent selling one made because they cant, they are just selling thelicense to use thir design in your concept. I get it now but still, as far as demo's go this is rather dsconcerning
lynel1985 2 years ago
They need a heck of alot of energy using liquid nitrogen to keep superconductors alof to minimize drag. This guys plexiglass model would produce a hell of alot of drag. even the most well designed motors cannot escape the basic principles. Many motors are good but produce no usable power. he might as well call it fusion energy given his claims it should be able o run off of its own output yes? Then of course with an excess of energy back ino the system it shouldspin out of control. yes?
ydeardorff 2 years ago
i find it amusing that people have searched for free engery for decades, yet finally it seems someone manages to create a working concept and they instantly try and commercialise it. Isnt this half the reason (or more) people have searched for free energy besides the benefit to the enviroment haha i find that rather amusing, BUt again this is only relavent if the concept is real
lynel1985 2 years ago