1995 japanese gp. quallifying
Uploader Comments (scarsurfing)
Top Comments
-
Of the three I think Hakkinen drove the best.
-
@scarsurfing Williams and Benetton were not equal, the Benetton was aerodynamically inferior to the Williams which was at least half a second faster on paper despite having the same engine. Mechanically the Benetton was better but it is aerodynamics that have the most significant influence on performance.
All Comments (12)
-
Definitely
-
Me too my friend.. Great times for F1 back then..Even without the great Ayrton...
-
@chouzouris Yeah.
-
@rich1701 let us not forget Newey designed the williams so it was better than the Benetton,
-
you mean a lot more than the latest ones?
-
LIke these older onboards a lot more than the older ones.
-
you can see a good car as the driver dont make to many movement at the sterring, also mclaren was really bad in 1995 and Williams just brilliant
And while McLaren Mercedes were really bad and Williams Renault were just Brilliant, in 1995 Benetton Renault & Michael Schumacher left them both wondering which way was up. I'm not Michael's biggest fan but the B195 Benetton wasn't as good as the Williams yet he destroyed them that year.
Holden308 1 year ago
@Holden308 I think the car was as good since and they had the same engine ,I just read an old artical where Herbert said he only got two testing days all of that year and Micheal did all the testing.Benneton/Renault under Flav and Simmonds always worked the team like that.
scarsurfing 1 year ago