@TheAmbassador11 "whenever someone from that era who may have had some knowledge to JFK's murder, the "lone nutters" explain it away or say the person(s) is lying"
i agree again ive never met an LN who doesnt summarily dismiss numerous witnesses as being liars / loonys /seeking their 15 minutes or mistaken .that said if a witness can be shown to have changed or added to their story i think they should be deemed to be unreliable as a witness.
@TheAmbassador11 "There is more to LHO than people are willing to admit"
have to agree with that ,we were all told oswald was a lone nut a billy no mates who wouldnt talk to anyone yet someone went to the trouble of impersonating him .some people still argue he wasnt impersonated but we have official documentation as well as witnesses that verify it .
@fobrien1 There is more to LHO than people are willing to admit. It looked as if it was already decided that Oswald would take the blame. Too many events ocurred before the assassination. Leads were ignored and to this day whenever someone from that era who may have had some knowledge to JFK's murder, the "lone nutters" explain it away or say the person(s) is lying.
@LiquorWreckedEmGood ive debated a ot of people on here (there are allsorts )those who debate with insults and vile names and those who atleast offer some evidence .but what they seem to have in common is a pathological hatred of (oswald) and this is a man they never even knew .ive seen people post oswalds post autopsy photos taking great pleasure that he got what he deserved ,this is pure bias by LNs this is why its important to have an open mind when looking at the evidence.
I once debated LoneNutter on another video thread. His contention is that unless you know ALL the facts, you cannot conclude conspiracy.
I put forth the scenario where you wake up suddenly in the middle of the night and hear near simultaneous crashes through your front and back windows (opposite sides of the house).
"Can you not conclude a conspiracy in that case?", I asked.
@LoneNutter1 Mr. Tomlinson, who found the bullet traditionally known as CE 399, stated that it was not the same bullet he found. He has gone on record as saying that the bullet he found had a pointed tip. The bullet known as CE 399 has a round tip. CE 399 was a "plant".
@LoneNutter1 Okay, since a whole bullet was found on a stretcher that alledgedly came from J.Connally and since bullet fragments remained in him until he died, that would indicate that he was hit with two bullets. The bullet that supposedly came from him found on the stretcher did not have enought fragments missing to be the same bullet that did leave fragments.
@TheAmbassador11 Do you know why there was no human tissue or blood on the bullet? Two reasons;
The bullet was improperly handled when discovered by the hospital orderly and given to a law enforcement officer who put it in his pocket. If there were blood and tissue on the bullet it would have rubbed off in the pocket.
2. Intact bullets found outside a body rarely have blood and tissue on them.
@TheAmbassador11 "whenever someone from that era who may have had some knowledge to JFK's murder, the "lone nutters" explain it away or say the person(s) is lying"
i agree again ive never met an LN who doesnt summarily dismiss numerous witnesses as being liars / loonys /seeking their 15 minutes or mistaken .that said if a witness can be shown to have changed or added to their story i think they should be deemed to be unreliable as a witness.
fobrien1 1 month ago
@TheAmbassador11 "There is more to LHO than people are willing to admit"
have to agree with that ,we were all told oswald was a lone nut a billy no mates who wouldnt talk to anyone yet someone went to the trouble of impersonating him .some people still argue he wasnt impersonated but we have official documentation as well as witnesses that verify it .
fobrien1 1 month ago
@fobrien1 There is more to LHO than people are willing to admit. It looked as if it was already decided that Oswald would take the blame. Too many events ocurred before the assassination. Leads were ignored and to this day whenever someone from that era who may have had some knowledge to JFK's murder, the "lone nutters" explain it away or say the person(s) is lying.
TheAmbassador11 1 month ago
@mocus1 which documentary is this ? ill bet gary mack had a starring role .
fobrien1 1 month ago
@LiquorWreckedEmGood ive debated a ot of people on here (there are allsorts )those who debate with insults and vile names and those who atleast offer some evidence .but what they seem to have in common is a pathological hatred of (oswald) and this is a man they never even knew .ive seen people post oswalds post autopsy photos taking great pleasure that he got what he deserved ,this is pure bias by LNs this is why its important to have an open mind when looking at the evidence.
fobrien1 1 month ago
I once debated LoneNutter on another video thread. His contention is that unless you know ALL the facts, you cannot conclude conspiracy.
I put forth the scenario where you wake up suddenly in the middle of the night and hear near simultaneous crashes through your front and back windows (opposite sides of the house).
"Can you not conclude a conspiracy in that case?", I asked.
His reply: "No. It could have been a device".
Don't waste your time.
LiquorWreckedEmGood 1 month ago
@fobrien1
"oswald drew attention to himself and was witnessed moving from seat to seat sitting next to allmost all the patrons"
-- almost like he was there to meet somebody but wasn't sure who ...
LiquorWreckedEmGood 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1 Mr. Tomlinson, who found the bullet traditionally known as CE 399, stated that it was not the same bullet he found. He has gone on record as saying that the bullet he found had a pointed tip. The bullet known as CE 399 has a round tip. CE 399 was a "plant".
TheAmbassador11 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1 Okay, since a whole bullet was found on a stretcher that alledgedly came from J.Connally and since bullet fragments remained in him until he died, that would indicate that he was hit with two bullets. The bullet that supposedly came from him found on the stretcher did not have enought fragments missing to be the same bullet that did leave fragments.
TheAmbassador11 1 month ago
@TheAmbassador11 Do you know why there was no human tissue or blood on the bullet? Two reasons;
The bullet was improperly handled when discovered by the hospital orderly and given to a law enforcement officer who put it in his pocket. If there were blood and tissue on the bullet it would have rubbed off in the pocket.
2. Intact bullets found outside a body rarely have blood and tissue on them.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago