Apollo 16 full dust analysis

A complete debunk of the slowed down 66.66% theory. Here I show the ballistic motion of the dust is astonishingly consistent with Lunar gravity. To make the dust fall as per Earth gravity makes the rest of the footage look truly bizarre. Not least the camera sweeps!

I welcome any comment discussing it, disputing and refuting it. I do not welcome abuse or armwaving.

This webpage suggested by Cosmored, shows the equation and verifies my math for the initial velocity:-
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/traj.html#tra13


Apollo 16 EVA 3 Station 10 - duration 3mins 21.6seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kibAjb6qjtQ


Apollo 16 EVA 3 Station 10 - 245% faster - duration 1min 22.24seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U29xEXsVXug

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• apollo 16
• apollo hoax debunked
• apollo hoax
• apollo speeded up
• apollo debunking
• apollo hoax debunking
• apollo footage
• apollo moon landings

[loperspest]

You know what would have been perfect for the sped up part?

Yakety Sax..

[AstroClownBuster]

@Betamax101

Your use of the word magic is quite funny, you don't see the base of his foot, you don't see his boot in contact with the 'dust' as he kick it, therefore something that eject the dust for him, as he just doing the movement with his leg, is possible and certainly not magic since it would just have to not be seen which is clearly possible here as they ar eon a slope and the foot is not visible as well as the ground around his left leg.

[mrdrumsauce]

This is excellent, thank you for this analysis. People who believe the moon landings were a hoax have S-4-B.

[Betamax101]

@GUARDIANtrooper2 I have seen all these pictures. They are marks on the lens - probably dust. They are present on the surface as well, and they occur in successive photoghraphs - the "stars" are never in the same place. Really it is just not possible. The stars are several orders of magnitude lower in illumination than the Moon.

[GUARDIANtrooper2]

@Betamax101 If anything is debatable I have to be skeptic about it. But this whole ordeal has just too many inconsistencies to dismiss on any level of the debate. Check out this site called Soviet Moon Images, these pictures are untouched. You could clearly see stars very visible in those pictures that you and others said couldn't not be taken, because of photo resolution. My teacher told me about this site and said you should check it out. I'll PM you the site, can't put it here...

[Betamax101]

@GUARDIANtrooper2 The video was not slowed down a bit and no such admission was made. When you contend the guys were "dancing around" on invisible wires, sometimes many hundreds of yards away, after the camera has tracked them moving that far, I THEN analise dust and objects and find the same consistency of motion.

If you wish to debate this subject properly, send me a pm with an email address(set up a temp one if you wish). Youtube is a useless place to do this.

I have seen both sides.

[Betamax101]

@GUARDIANtrooper2 I have not blocked him, he has blocked me. I left the comment on your channel, the ID without the 2.

Friction ride? Huh? A vacuum has no friction. They went around the outer edge of the belts.

Radio waves carried on S-band - proven as reliable and used today.

Fuel? Do you know how rockets travel in space? They fired once and followed a wide Earth orbit to the Moon.

Newtonian physics/ orbital mechanics to calculate trajectory

watch?v=YuH4rxda3Z4 for TLI around the belts.

[Betamax101]

@GUARDIANtrooper2 I give everything scientific scrutiny. Apart from stars, name me one consistency you think is completely solid.

watch?v=2OnZwqc-96Y

Please don't come back with C-rocks/ missing coke bottles or odd shadows - it demonstrates a complete non understanding and a lack of research.

I apologise for the insult, and I really didn't block you, the idiot cosmored is not blocked, so do the math.

[Betamax101]

@GUARDIANtrooper2 " I don't see low gravity". I am a phycisist and I see nothing but low gravity. The dust DOES land more slowly, that is the point you can't seem to get. This is impossible to fake. You simply cannot fake gravity. There are no inconsistencies, I have seen every one of them, they are made by people like you who think stars should be visible on film and video. You keep avoiding answering the point made in the video.To make the dust fall Earth gravity, makes astronauts too fast.