Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Stephen Meyer on The Tavis Smiley Show part 1 of 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,350
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 26, 2008

Stephen C. Meyer is interviewed by Tavis Smiley.

For more information about Stephen C. Meyer, check out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Meyer

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 23 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (120)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why didn't he show up in court and defend his ID argument. [not a theory]

  • honest question, has the discovery institute ever discovered anything?

  • @ All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'.Homochirality

    A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!!!. Which is toxic to life!!.there is ZERO chance of RNA forming by chance or on a primordial earth or even under amazing conditions in labs.and ZERO chemistry to support it..all we do is copy information,thats not creating anything! Intelligence created life

  • Refuted on what exactly? They believe they see intelligence in complex systems and DNA code. In their opinion random mutation and natural selection can not explain this. Nobody has refuted this or they would not still be arguing the point. People have arguing other points some of them good and that is why it is a debate. Nobody has explained the formation of DNA so nothing has been refuted and Meyer is free to state his point. Why do you care so much about this?

    Couldn't have said better.

  • If you study deeply a DNA molecule, you'll find so much well organized informations that you can not simply give credit that all this was a result by chance. And this is from just a molecule perspective (imagine all the complexity of a a human being)

    It's just about this undoubtable logic that presumes an evidence of a Inteligent Designer. It's simply much more convencing than the atheist perspective that we are all a result by chance, with no proposal, rules or whatever...

  • ID is pure science. The thing is that the more the real and honest sceince advances, the more evidences of designer you find, and that has to be God.

  • atheists are getting more and more stupid as science evolves,

  • "Certain things are best answered by Intelligent Design"???

    But you don't give an answer. "God dunnit" isn't an "answer", its the ultimate avoidance of an answer.

  • @jmlew

    hey ignorant science nerd

    explain why the 5000 year I Ching anticipates what they found at the atomic level of DNA?

    eh????????????????

    google do a search for 55 Ho Tu DNA Katya Walter

    have a nice day

    'western linear casual BS science' BTW is on the UP and UP, it is on a learning curve

    give yourself a shake

  • Steven Meyer, "self appointed senior fellow" at the un-Discovery Institute for the mentally and intellectually challenged.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more