@whitemanwaydownsouth The race of the "New Black Panthers" (they are NOT the real Black Panthers) has NOTHING AT ALL to do with the charges being dropped (nothing was "brushed under the rug") This was dropped because THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME. Yes, they shouted at a few people, NOBODY was prevented from voting, and given the THOUSANDS of black voters disenfranchised, this racist tempest in a teapot deserves ZERO attention from the Justice Department.
@blujesus are you saying the race of the black panthers accused has nothing to do with the justice dept just kinda brushing the voter intimidation thing under the rug?? are you really saying that??well idiot, eric holder himself said that no blacks would be charged with hate crime while he was in charge. so, race IS a factor, look at holders "my people " statements. just because i mention race and i happen to be white does not invalidate what i say, no matter how much you wish it did.
the guy "WHITEMANWAYDOWNSOUTH" who posted this video mentioned race. several times. his ENTIRE ARGUMENT is that holder did not prosecute the panthers because of racism.
besides, YOU wrote: "threatened anyone not 'voting black'." so YOU DID INDEED "mention" race.
I suggest you take your foot out of your mouth and read your own comments a little more carefully so that you don't continue to make a fool out of yourself.
@blujesus Who mentioned "race" ? So to respond to my comment with your entire subject centered on something I didn't even mention is to illustrate your incompetence.
there are any number of reasons why holder or any other prosecutor might not pursue a case. I actually don't agree with holder's decision either, but it is ONE CASE. is there a PATTERN of this kind of decision from holder? I'm sure if there were other similar cases fox news would be all over it. did you listen to what the BP leader said about the obama admin? "same page"? really?
what's "racist" is to assume that because they share skin color, holder is on the same page as the black panthers. the panthers HATE the obama admin. see for yourself: watch?v=KR6mPgSxPtY
I guess as opposed to the radical right wing biased "news" sources that you seem to rely on. you guys crack me up with the "bias" tag. EVERY person, organization, etc. has "bias" in one way or another.
BTW- I did some looking for the quote in question [I couldn't find it] but I did find this- this is how the panthers feel about the obama admin. the two are hardly on the same page. watch?v=KR6mPgSxPtY
@whitemanwaydownsouth The race of the "New Black Panthers" (they are NOT the real Black Panthers) has NOTHING AT ALL to do with the charges being dropped (nothing was "brushed under the rug") This was dropped because THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME. Yes, they shouted at a few people, NOBODY was prevented from voting, and given the THOUSANDS of black voters disenfranchised, this racist tempest in a teapot deserves ZERO attention from the Justice Department.
Holder NEVER said that, by the way.
PrisonerNumber9653 7 months ago
@blujesus are you saying the race of the black panthers accused has nothing to do with the justice dept just kinda brushing the voter intimidation thing under the rug?? are you really saying that??well idiot, eric holder himself said that no blacks would be charged with hate crime while he was in charge. so, race IS a factor, look at holders "my people " statements. just because i mention race and i happen to be white does not invalidate what i say, no matter how much you wish it did.
whitemanwaydownsouth 9 months ago
@ASentinel2 "Who mentioned "race" ?"
who mentioned race?!?!
the guy "WHITEMANWAYDOWNSOUTH" who posted this video mentioned race. several times. his ENTIRE ARGUMENT is that holder did not prosecute the panthers because of racism.
besides, YOU wrote: "threatened anyone not 'voting black'." so YOU DID INDEED "mention" race.
I suggest you take your foot out of your mouth and read your own comments a little more carefully so that you don't continue to make a fool out of yourself.
blujesus 9 months ago
@blujesus Who mentioned "race" ? So to respond to my comment with your entire subject centered on something I didn't even mention is to illustrate your incompetence.
Thank You....Now...
Piss on you and Holder and Obamas....
ASentinel2 9 months ago
@whitemanwaydownsouth "he is on the same page"
there are any number of reasons why holder or any other prosecutor might not pursue a case. I actually don't agree with holder's decision either, but it is ONE CASE. is there a PATTERN of this kind of decision from holder? I'm sure if there were other similar cases fox news would be all over it. did you listen to what the BP leader said about the obama admin? "same page"? really?
blujesus 10 months ago
@blujesus this is where you are once again incorrect. the fact that holder refuses to prosecute the black panthers shows that he is on the same page.
whitemanwaydownsouth 10 months ago
@blujesus LOL its also racist to pretrend to not see the obvious when it shows the racism that plagues the political party you support.
whitemanwaydownsouth 10 months ago
@ASentinel2
what's "racist" is to assume that because they share skin color, holder is on the same page as the black panthers. the panthers HATE the obama admin. see for yourself: watch?v=KR6mPgSxPtY
blujesus 10 months ago
@whitemanwaydownsouth "liberal biased media"
I guess as opposed to the radical right wing biased "news" sources that you seem to rely on. you guys crack me up with the "bias" tag. EVERY person, organization, etc. has "bias" in one way or another.
BTW- I did some looking for the quote in question [I couldn't find it] but I did find this- this is how the panthers feel about the obama admin. the two are hardly on the same page. watch?v=KR6mPgSxPtY
blujesus 10 months ago
@blujesus because it was not reported on the liberal biased media outlets available to you in sweden.
whitemanwaydownsouth 10 months ago