Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Carville vs Richardson part 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
7,548
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 23, 2008

Carville vs Richardson part 3

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • ...and you have DUMBASS written on yours

  • carville is a tool. so revote and bring back richardson, edwards et at?? - look Fl is RIGGED people. She could win by 35% margin in FL because the republicans WANT to run against Hillary. She will get STEAMROLLED by the MSM/Rethug machine in the gen election. You KNOW something is fishy if fox is giving Hillary a pass right now. WAKE UP PEOPLE! Even still- with a 20% margin of victory in MI and FL Hillary STILL loses in overall pledged delegates - she'll add max 35 delegates. That's a minor dent

see all

All Comments (57)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'm about as far to the right as you can get, especially when it comes to the economy/spending....but anyway....Richardson should've been the democratic nominee in 2008, the fact that he's not just furthers my belief that presidents for decades now are nothing more than puppets. The media picks their pony if you will for who is the most marketable for each party, not who is the best candidate.

  • Dude, this douchebag posted that on the other two Carville v. Richardson vids. Ignore him, and he will go away.

  • Who the hell ever NEEDED Alan Keyes lol

  • Barack Hussein Obama has *666* written on head...!!!

  • fuck hillary and the lesbian that she rode in on!!!!!

  • Where is Alan keys when we need him?

  • Well, the media, I can't argue. I understand I think better than many the frustration with the media as a Richardson supporter. THey hardly covered him, so he didn't do too well. Same with Joe Biden, so I'd agree that the coverage is skewed toward Obama for the most part, but lets not kid ourselves, he's gotten his share of negative coverage. But you're right on the bias.

  • His audience started cheering when he 'scratched' himself. Even if he didn't mean to give her the finger, he should have told the audience that he did not mean what they thought. I think he meant it.

    Calling her Anni Oakley (which is a strange insult, don't you think?) is mocking. He could just made a statement. Instead, he had to make fun of her. Yet, the media didn't criticize him for it, but any little Obama insult Hillary made was blown out of proportion and she was vigorously attacked.

  • I absolutely agree that Obama isn't a saint. No one really is. I thought from the beginning that Richardson was the most qualified and that's why I caucused for him. But Obama never gave Clinton the finger, he was scratching himself, a lot of people scratch with the middle finger. And Clinton didn't raise her hand in the first debate when asked who had ever owned a gun before, so the idea that she's a hunter makes the mocking appropriate. But anyway. I'm glad you and I could debate civilly.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more