Unexploded Nanothermite Found In WTC Dust
Uploader Comments (ThisWeekInFascism)
Top Comments
-
In your exchange with ThisWeekInFascism, you were mostly correct. However, the chemical energy released isn't the same if a different % of the molecules react.
Truthers don't need to come up with an exact theory of the crime to prove Muslims/Arabs didn't pull off 9-11. There shouldn't have been any unreacted thermitic material incorporating nanotechnology in the WTC dust. And WTC7 shouldn't have been able to fall with the acceleration of gravity for 2.25 secs.
Case closed.
-
Go to my channel, to see fresh interview with Niels Harrit, the main author and chemist from Denmark. Great interview from Danish news with english subs - truth is about to break the ice :)
All Comments (96)
-
Without a fully legislated community supported 100% Congressional Amnesty to protect any of the guilty from ignorant prosecution after they try to tell the truth nothing good &\or true will happen & everything bad Alex Jones rants on about is certain.
Some people in the system tried hard to screw the 911 black-op from the inside yet America remains like a blind deluded wounded giant stumbling around while looking for someone to butt-fcuk in vengeance because they went to sleep since the 60's.
-
9/11/2011 - Ten Years, No Justice
/watch?v=FxPaebHe3fw
-
theres no were to hide now, the truth is out and the official fairy tale is finished.
-
Bull shit. This stuff(thermate) cannot be formed by natural collapse and processes. It depraves the first law of THERMODYNAMICS. GO to school and learn some science!
If in a match head is sulphur, nitrate etc and also in the WTC1/2 than by collapse there are not spontaneous matchheads formed. This stuf is made inlayers of nano dimensions. This ONLY can be made(and i,m SURE 100%) its made in military labs or factories!
-
These traitors are busted. I'll bet they never thought the people would keep this alive for 10 years. And the bastards are still tryin to cover it up. Did you see that surprise move about 6 months ago by the Pentagon, they bought up all 10,000 1st run copies of Lt. Col. Schaffer's book and burned them to keep people from knowing about info that was kept out of the 9,11 report? What's it going to take for the people to say enough is a enough? And 9,11 is tiny compared to some of their other shit.
-
@Idiotsmakemesad Mark Basile: "One of the things that i'd like to stress about these chips is that they really shouldn't be there. There are not a natural formed agglomeration of aluminum from the aircraft, or materials that were in the building, and iron oxide that got knocked off... These chips are not naturally occurring, they are not going to form because some materials fall down in a building and touch each other, and get compressed together, that's just not what this material is."
-
@Idiotsmakemesad "that these particles formed naturally"
Wow, really?
So we can expect to find evidence of this in previous "destruction" or was that a Freudian slip?
Show me ONE building "pancake" pre or post 9/11 that had the entirety of it's contents rendered into confetti and dust then you'll have your control group to test this brilliant hypothesis of yours.
I'm waiting with 'baited breath'.
-
@Idiotsmakemesad lol @"the probability of the alternative hypothesis that these particles formed naturally in the process of the towers destruction."
They should have looked for diamonds formed in the process as well then I guess after all carbon was being crushed by huge weights.
Sorry to disillusion you but nano thermite is a very high tech substance with restricted acces.
Only top govt and top military have access to it.
Doesnt that tell you something?
Hard proof this is not. No attempt is made to examine the probability of the alternative hypothesis that these particles formed naturally in the process of the towers destruction. What we do know is that all the elements necessary for this to happen were a part of the towers construction, and in very large quantities. We also know that much of construction material was quite literally turned to dust (despite the fancy name that's all nano-particles are). So common, Occam's Razor people.
Idiotsmakemesad 1 year ago
@Idiotsmakemesad @Idiotsmakemesad You say, "No attempt is made to examine the probability of the alternative hypothesis that these particles formed naturally in the process of the towers destruction."...
cont'd
ThisWeekInFascism 1 year ago
That's like a homicide investigator saying, "let's examine the alternative hypothesis that the knife entered the victim on it's own." That's not science. That's instead, wishing an uncomfortable truth weren't true. That's religion. It's the domain of cowards. Certainly NOT Occam's Razor.
What elements from the construction made the towers explode? …and "turn to dust" as you say?
Occam's razor?? To deny your own eyes violates that theorem in it's essence.
ThisWeekInFascism 1 year ago 3
@Idiotsmakemesad Nano combinations of chemicals are the signature of a manufacturing process.It's nano technology - specific blends of materials (in set ratios throughout a substance) can never occur by accident.
stratocaster539 1 year ago 4
@Idiotsmakemesad ...And another scientist has proven nanothermite in the dust.
/watch?v=frIpyTBAV_Y
ThisWeekInFascism 1 year ago