Questions on God

Several interesting philosophical questions on the nature of God have been asked by subscribers and presented to the White Winged Collective Consciousness of Nine.

They come forward, through Magenta Pixie, with their responses.



Music "Supernatural" by Kevin Macleod

Category:

Education

Tags:

• God
• consciousness
• Supreme
• being
• Prime
• creator
• One
• source
• thought
• Infinity
• Magenta
• Pixie
• channeling
• Ascension
• 2012

[sambawomen]

I could not have said it better my self :)))... But, I really do not understand why the word "God" is used? As it gives the impression of a being, and then to say "he" just confuses the matter further... why not just say "The All"? As that is everything & nothing... I feel the word "God" should be discontinued and real understanding can then begin.

[MagentaPixie2012]

@sambawomen this is all semantics. We each have a different idea of what a word means. Why "God" and "he" are used in the video is explained, this is to aid clarity not create confusion. When we understand the interpretations other people give to words then our communication level increases to a point where we can achieve true understanding & thus completeness with "others" :)

[Bugstomper2]

I know a few dumbass people that don't think and they still exist! LOL

[GabrielleMornvat]

it made my brain hurt but...yeah...

[deepfriendhere]

Woww the onething which i liked is the concept of spiral..like snake eating its tail..Gods memories is in circle , our are linear which makes past , present and future , a good concept

[Cloyde100]

@sambawomen ...Because God is a being.

[TrvD1]

The devil cannot enter ones mind unless the individual allows "him" to

[ralu4mike]

@kandiamo like there is no means to and end, actually i think that's only ego invented... reasoning everything to another thing

[Enleuk]

@kandiamo It's not by ease of convention that each word has one meaning. It's logically a neurological necessity that one person only has one word that is identical to itself. You're trying to hint at the objective truth behind the word, but that's unknowable and therefore irrelevant. We can only use our own understanding of the universe to define it. Of course, I can start calling furniture for cattle, that's "my affair" as you say, but not in a discussion about furniture.

[kandiamo]

@Enleuk I agree. But there are multiple books on consciousness beyond neurology which also define it beyond a single definition.

To make consciousness a science, it must be reproducible in experiments. Experiments so far produce what appears to be consciousness, but this is by no means set in stone and even neurologists agree with that. If people are comfortable calling God, "consciousness", that's their affair. But a single definition of consciousness is by ease of convention, not fact.

[Enleuk]

@kandiamo There are many and thick books written by neurologists and other fun people who clearly define what consciousness is. If you're gonna use the word consciousness you can't ignore these books. Consciousness can be God and vice versa, but if so, God is a neurological network of biological cells made from DNA made by carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen. If you want to change the definition of consciousness then you have to argue against all texts written about the word consciousness.

[kandiamo]

@kiefhouse These are beings from the beginning of creation. Of course they know how the universe is constructed. What's interesting is God is allowing them to communicate esoteric knowledge in a flood of instantaneous comprehension, along the lines of Daniel's "Knowledge will be increased". While this has always been possible, I think it's the world language English that makes its spread global ... kind of like Babel.

God will not have to sort mankind. Each chooses his god gladly now.

[kandiamo]

@ralu4mike Hmmm. Interesting.